Japan Could Be Offered 40 F-22s, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 4-7-2009 @ 05:23 PM by Harlequin
reply to post by FredT



AESA radar , arrow , lavi - all projects sold to the highest *chinese* bidder - latest `rumour` is the J-10 has an AESA set , and would be going to the PAK airforce with there shiny new airplanes.


reply posted on 5-7-2009 @ 12:05 AM by C0bzz
Originally posted by FredT
reply to
post by LeTan



In terms of close in manuvers the SU may actually have the edge but only by a hair. Both have vectored thrust and the Su's is 3-D versus 2D for the Raptor.

Here is a good primer on the Airframe
www.ausairpower.net...

and the Flanker
www.ausairpower.net...

Now the F/A-18 E or the F-35 versus the Flanker, Id put my money on the Flanker

[edit on 7/4/09 by FredT]


ARGH NOT CARLO KOPP AGAIN!!!!! he is the biggest douche in the universe, he wants his company modify F-111's and get F-22's and additionally get paid royalties for coming up with the idea. Therefore, he is no different to Lockheed Martin PR, or Boeing PR (Only Lockheed and Boeing are taken seriously by the defense community). He is merely having a sook because Australian Defense does not take him seriously, so he defames other aircraft.



I'd put money on the F-35 / Super Hornet, that's unless you give the Flanker mystical powers like Carlo Kopp does. Why is it RAMJET R-77 versus AIM-120C? For example.

Yeah that was a lesson that cost blood and the marines with thier F-35B are going to rely on a pod

Just like the Harrier I presume.

[edit on 5/7/2009 by C0bzz]


reply posted on 29-7-2009 @ 09:43 PM by xmotex
reply to post by Bushido Kanji



ATD-X (Shinsen IIRC) is actually more related to F-35 than to F-22, but it is optimized for the air defense role rather than for strike missions, reflecting Japan's purely defensive strategy.

In terms of role it is more similar to F-22, but more of an interceptor than a penetration fighter like F-22.

Thus stealth is not as much of a priority - it's not expected to fight inside an opponent's SAM envelope. It's optimized for speed for the interceptor mission.

Still if they are offered the option, I expect they will go for F-22.

With the financial hit they took on developing the F-2 I suspect they would prefer to leave the R & D costs to us.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 14 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 187 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 11 hours ago, 105 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 7 hours ago, 74 replies