It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Phoenix Lights (sometimes referred to as the "lights over Phoenix") were a series of widely sighted optical phenomena (generally unidentified flying objects) that occurred in the skies over the U.S. states of Arizona and Nevada, and the Mexican state of Sonora on March 13, 1997. A repeat of the lights occurred February 6, 2007, and was filmed by the local Fox News TV station.
The second event has been more thoroughly covered by the media, due in part to the military's backing of the explanation. The USAF explained the second event as slow falling, long burning flares dropped by an A-10 Warthog aircraft on a training exercise over Luke Air Force Base. An investigation by Luke AFB itself also came to this conclusion and declared the case solved.[22] More recent investigations have come to the same conclusion.
Originally posted by kiwifoot
reply to post by kiwifoot
I don't really see how he's making the connection between the Phoenix Lights incident and the crash
I wlll watch again and see if I missed something.
Although blaming stationary, hovering lights on flares seems ridiculous to me.
I'm pretty sure flares don't float in formations.
Unless they are dropped in an ascending and banking fashion from very far away...on a very calm and clear night over a desert region.
This assumes that the flares weren't modified specifically to last longer with a parachute. The heat source of the burning of the flare would provide a heat bouyancy and the mix could be made for a longer slower burn.
If hollywood can make it, then you can be sure that the military can make it also.
Originally posted by ronishia
makes me giggle when the phoenix lights get attributed to simple flares tbh
take alook at my tinwiki article i done and the pictures and tell me if them are flares lol
tinwiki article on pheonix lights including pics
as for the OP's videos i dont really know what to make of them or how accurate this person is etc
Originally posted by ronishia
reply to post by weedwhacker
yea i get what your saying wether or not it was alien is another matter altogether but they were certainly UFO's
Originally posted by mad bloke
Why would they need a dna test for a A10 pilot. do that many pilots crash in 1 day?
Originally posted by ronishia
makes me giggle when the phoenix lights get attributed to simple flares tbh
take alook at my tinwiki article i done and the pictures and tell me if them are flares lol
tinwiki article on pheonix lights including pics
as for the OP's videos i dont really know what to make of them or how accurate this person is etc
Originally posted by mad bloke
Why would they need a dna test for a A10 pilot. do that many pilots crash in 1 day?
Originally posted by bluestreak53
Originally posted by mad bloke
Why would they need a dna test for a A10 pilot. do that many pilots crash in 1 day?
Because the USAF had to make sure it was the pilot who was in the crashed aircraft and not just someone else the ETs had put in there when they dumped the captured A-10 on the mountain (okay, I don't want to get anyone excited and foaming in the mouth - that is just a joke for those of you who have "half a brain", chuckle, chuckle).
No, I don't know why the USAF would have to do a DNA test but perhaps one of these really smart and highly intelligent ATS posters who are smarter than all the other dopes posting on ATS can explain this to us?
Of course, if the plane did land somewhere where the pilot dropped off the bomb cargo, then conceivably a different pilot could have taken off and crashed the A-10 in the mountain I suppose. But obviously there is no evidence that the plane landed because the Air Force would know if it did and would tell us this, so to say this is just an insult to the dead pilot. ;-)