posted on Jun, 28 2009 @ 07:53 AM
Originally posted by FreeYou
I will say this one time, and one time only.
I know my place, im not here to resolve your issues.
OK - the first line there sounds like it's for dramatic effect & adding that together with your opening post it sounds like you are trying to appear
enlightened/specially chosen one/indigo star child...?
Is that your intention? Because if it is - then that's rather arrogant & egotistical behaviour which kind of negates your whole claim to being
If that's not your intention then you might want to re-think how you write your posts because that's certainly how you're coming over to others.
Just an observation.
By the way - your post sounds like utter nonesense.
Are you on drugs?
Do you need to be?
Or do you have any evidence that this is real?
...I just ran your theories through a rather complicated set of dimensional-spatio scientific instrumentation designed to calculate the behavioural
ratio in relation to the inverse probability drive...mumblemumble...hang on... the results are just coming through now......hmm...it doesn't look
good....it turns out that there is a 98.99% probability that your theories are most likely a load of sh*t....
...funnily enough the remaining 1.01% of probability appears to suggest that your theory is actually squeezy-cheeze (the cheese in a tube).
[edit on 28/6/2009 by moobaawoof]