It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

G8 gives Iran until September to respond to U.S. nuclear offer

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 07:57 AM
link   
From Haaretz...Here

G8 gives Iran until September to respond to U.S. nuclear offer

So if they say no... and they WILL say no... what happens? More sanctions? War?

I know we've talked about it since 2006, but after the whole up-to-now failed CIA backed revolution.. and all the propaganda and the outrage in the medias about NEDA and all that... a bunch of people changed their mind about an Iran war.

First, Obama said he gave Iran until the end of the year. Now it's september... closer because of economic collapse? Because of the fresh iranian election crackdown propaganda?

We'll see.




posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 08:19 AM
link   
just another empty threat by the powers of the world. Obviously, the US or anyone else doesnt have the cohones to impose restrictions or sanctions. North Korea seems to be running along tickity-boo.

all i hear is blah blah blah



posted on Jun, 26 2009 @ 04:59 PM
link   
A.) this is not a CIA backed anything. As I've been stating repeatedly, why on Earth would the CIA back it? In all technicality, the CIA does not fail. Please don't even think they do on these matters. But the simple fact is that a pro-west Iran means the destruction of validity to remain there. Why would the CIA insure that any reason to be in the region is gone. Are they actually acting to make us want to fail? There would be no legal stature to remain there. We would have mass protests on our hands an in no way possible the ability to stop the forceful removal of US forces there by Russian and CHinese demands or by the demands of our own people


B.) There will be no war with Iran. Stop hyperventilating, stop war mongering, stop assuming. No person of even 10% knowing of the region would invade Iran in the position of the US. Let's see. A US controlled Iran would do what now that's so bad? It would cause millions of people who hate America to leave Iran and go to Russia or China. How do you plan on not having China and Russia get involved? Because they will.

C.) A destroyed Iran is a useless Iran. The current position of Iran and the US dictates a peaceful resolution. The US has no more money to fight Iran and rebuild afterwards, and the Iranians have no love of US forces entering their lands. In contrast, an Iran lead by opposition leaders to create a secular republic would establish the beginning of trade in the region. How on Earth is that nor more viable? More people, more customers, more money. Simple economics.


D.) If you knew anything of Iranian history you would see that what is happening now mirrors the 89 revolution. These things come and go in waves of revolution. This is how revolution works. You're so conditioned on viewing revolution as a unification of people with common interest across a nation all grabbing guns and going to war. NO! That's not how it works. You only need look at US history to know this. Revolution takes a decade at least. And it will come. It will not come now, nor a week from now. It will come years from now. That's the way it is.

And so I repeat yet again. There will be no war. There will be no intervention. There will only be an on-off Revolution cumulating with an eventual final clash in the capitol that will decide the future.



new topics
 
0

log in

join