Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
And I wonder who could be behind this effort to marginalize, trivialize and compromise the movement? Hint: it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out.

So why do you have to wonder who I am? I can tell you right now. I am either...

a) A CIA agent coming here to spread mockery and disinformation to divide the truther movement and get you all bickering amomg yourselves and keep you all weak, OR

b) a NSA agent coming here to conduct electronic spying on you to see who is coming close to discovering the truth, so that I can make you disappear. OR

c) a FBI agent coming here to see who isn't goosestepping according to the official story, so that we can arrest you under home security laws, OR

d) neither a CIA agent or a NSA agent or even a FBI agent becuase all those agencies have more important things to do than waste their time on your paranoid fairy tales, and I'm simply an average joe who is amused at seeing your beloved conspiracy theories blow up in your face whenever I prove how they're complete rubbish.

Care to take a guess?

Originally posted by GoodOlDave

Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
And I wonder who could be behind this effort to marginalize, trivialize and compromise the movement? Hint: it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this one out.

So why do you have to wonder who I am? I can tell you right now. I am either...

a) A CIA agent coming here to spread mockery and disinformation to divide the truther movement and get you all bickering amomg yourselves and keep you all weak, OR

b) a NSA agent coming here to conduct electronic spying on you to see who is coming close to discovering the truth, so that I can make you disappear. OR

c) a FBI agent coming here to see who isn't goosestepping according to the official story, so that we can arrest you under home security laws, OR

d) neither a CIA agent or a NSA agent or even a FBI agent becuase all those agencies have more important things to do than waste their time on your paranoid fairy tales, and I'm simply an average joe who is amused at seeing your beloved conspiracy theories blow up in your face whenever I prove how they're complete rubbish.

Care to take a guess?

How about e) moron with half a brain
I vote for "e". Dimitri's book is the best explaination to date of the mysteries of 9-11. I stood on my rooftop in the east village and watched the second tower explode and there was no plane! If Osama Bin Laden can cause a mile of steel to turn into dust he is the greatest magician of all times. Bravo Dimitri.

Those powers that be are so tricky.

First they fly planes into the buildings and start fires so that people will think the buildings, which they intend to bring down with nukes, are really collapsing due to office fires.

Meanwhile, because they know that some people will see through the "office fires" story, they set the building up for an explosive demolition using thermate shaped charges and multiple conventional explosive detonations, all well attested, by dozens of witnesses, including news reporters from the MSM, who were still doing their jobs on 9/11.

Then they bring the buildings down with nukes, buried 70 meters under the basement, causing the towers to disintegrate from the top down.

Not.

Despite saying some interesting things about underground nuclear explosions, Khalezov's theory as applied to 9/11, does not conform to the events as they unfolded.

Sorry Dimitri, no sale.

Originally posted by ipsedixit
Those powers that be are so tricky.

First they fly planes into the buildings and start fires so that people will think the buildings, which they intend to bring down with nukes, are really collapsing due to office fires.

They're even trickier that that. Only a few posts back someone said I was a "moron with half a brain" for actually believing a plane really hit the south tower. So, the planes had to be either...

a) a hologram which most people could see, but he couldn't due to his specific observation point

b) every single video is faked and every single eyewitness in Manhattan is really a disinformation agent

...but either way, apparently that makes YOU a "moron with half a brain" for believing planes hit the towers, too. There, I'm SO glad the conspiracy people are all so devoted to the truth.

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...but either way, apparently that makes YOU a "moron with half a brain" for believing planes hit the towers, too. There, I'm SO glad the conspiracy people are all so devoted to the truth.

Dave you should just abandon all the personal insults and ad hominem attacks. They are violations of the T&C and just cause people to regard you as a shill who contributes nothing to threads. If you can contribute intelligently, by all means do so. If you can't, don't clutter up the threads with childish nonsense.

Originally posted by ipsedixit

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...but either way, apparently that makes YOU a "moron with half a brain" for believing planes hit the towers, too. There, I'm SO glad the conspiracy people are all so devoted to the truth.

Dave you should just abandon all the personal insults and ad hominem attacks. They are violations of the T&C and just cause people to regard you as a shill who contributes nothing to threads. If you can contribute intelligently, by all means do so. If you can't, don't clutter up the threads with childish nonsense.

I'm not posting personal insults and attacks. Look up a few posts before mine and you'll see for yourself that someone is saying "i'm a moron with half a brain" for believing the buildings were really hit by planes. I'm simply pointing out that If YOU believe planes actually hit the buildings this necesaarily means according to the truthers, you're a "moron with half a brain" every bit as I am.

OR, it's really the case that this so called "truther movement" isn't any actual movement, but a gaggle of conspiracy theorists attempting to hijack the events of 9/11 to promote their own individual agendas, and they're all but getting into fistfights with each other over what this "blatantly a conspiracy" actually is specifically because everyone is trying to push their agendas onto each other. EXACTLY like I've been saying since day one,

Why this is relevent is simple- why the heck would someone with a sincere interest in exposing the true perpetrators behind the 9/11 attack write an "expensive book" if not out of an agenda to promote their own self serving financial gain? Paul Revere never charged anyone to find out that the British were coming, did he?