Keeping track of the "Swine Flu Frenzy' can be a little hard. Especially hear on ATS; where there are already so many threads dedicated to this
enigma.
Its has astounded me that, in the last few days, talkback radio announcers have backed down considerably regarding theie opinions of severity of the
Swine Flu.
John Stanely, a radio announcer of Sydneys 2UE, yesterday had a forum in which he interveiwed a promenant figure from within the SSWAHS, whom stated
the Swine Flu was infact no more deadly than previously known strains of influenza!
And went so far as to say that he expected no more deaths than usually associated with other strains.
The main drug that we usually hear about in relation to Swine Flu is: Tamiflu.
My question is: Was media employed to create hysteria, which the necessary course of treatment; as touted in most news bulletins is Tamiflu. Is Swine
Flu employed to create unwarranted need of this drug, making the Roche Pharmaceuticals an amazing profit; in a time of financial turmoil!
I smell conspiracy