STOP PRESS!! Swine Flu now announced as "another ordinary Flu", page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 02:02 AM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by evilod



"Flu related deaths"- this is a world of convenience for statisticians. It is a very grey area to be able to find a direct cause of death in many cases.
I've heard the it seems to be the elderly and the very young that are mostly at risk from Swine Flu- those without robust immunity. This is no different from other infuenza.
Flu related illness, resulting in death is another grey area.
Say, for example, an elderly person dies from Pnuemonia; couldn't this be conveniently transformed for the benefit of these "needed" influenza statistics? I suppose that evidence would be gleened from Post-mortem findings, and reports from family members etc. "granny had a flu, then she became more sick; doctor said she had pnuemonia".....
Reports of next of kin can be unreliable, and as far as I know, the only virus that is routinely tested for in post-mortem examination are both HIV and HCV.
From what avenue have they gained these statistics? And how reliable are they?




reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 05:19 AM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by andy1033



Interesting as to how it was "named and framed" almost immediately!
I'd like to find out the history of testing and labratory isolation of H1N1.
Its seems to have a great deal known about, ever since it has arrived on the scene; and incredibly know of or have a drug to negate it.



reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 07:26 PM by KRISKALI777
reply to post by spellbound



Hi Gang, here's an interesting article I read; in an attempt to understand why a frenzy would be created around the Roche Pharmaceuticals product Tamiflu.
I think this will give an insight for sceptics asking why? Why would they create a situation to move copious amounts of this drug.....as they say; 'its all business'!

Roche Seen Upping $42 Billion Genentech Bid After Rebuff PharmaManufacturing.com 02/26/2009 By Reuters Roche will likely up its bid for the 44 percent of Genentech it does not own, analysts said, after the U.S. biotech group urged shareholders to reject the offer. A special committee of Genentech Inc.'s board recommended shareholders reject Roche Holding AG's $42 billion bid, saying that, at $86.50 per share, it substantially undervalued the U.S. company. "Now the ball is back with the Basel company," Wegelin analyst Marco Schwender said. "It is clearly possible that investors will now hope for a better offer from Roche." The Swiss group plans to sell a four-part bond denominated in euros and sterling, Thomson Reuters publication IFR reported. Market talk is that the issue will raise at least four billion euros ($5.1 billion). Roche's surprise hostile offer for Genentech was pitched below the Swiss drugmaker's original rejected bid of $44 billion, or $89 per share. The lower price reflected tougher financing conditions and a drop in the U.S. group's shares. Roche has said that Genentech's banker, Goldman Sachs, had proposed $112 a share as an acceptable price, giving a glimpse of just how far apart the two sides are. The difference of opinion highlights the gap between Big Pharma's views — based on a relatively straightforward financial valuation argument — and biotech, which uses "soft elements" like strong science and products in early stages of development, JP Morgan analysts said. "How that gap can be bridged remains difficult to see for us — hence time to resolution may take longer than expected," they said in a note. "We are not surprised to see Genentech refuse Roche's lower offer," said Andrew Weiss, analyst at Swiss bank Vontobel. "We continue to believe that the Genentech asking price of $112 is too high, and that eventually Roche will need to improve its offer to $95-100." Genentech shares traded up 0.65 percent at $85.19 at 9:37 a.m. EST. Roche stock was down 2.1 percent at 140.20 Swiss francs, versus a 1.5 percent drop in the European healthcare sector. Prior to the bond news, Roche had sold a record $16 billion in debt to help finance the Genentech bid. It has said it plans to use a combination of its own funds, bonds, commercial paper and bank financing for the deal. "It is clear that with Roche raising capital there is no turning back and as such a sweetened offer should be expected," said Karl-Heinz Koch at Swiss brokerage Helvea earlier on Tuesday. Roche, which won a recent takeover battle for diagnostics company Ventana by sweetening an offer by some 19 percent, has noted the response of the Genentech committee, spokesman Daniel Piller said. In the Ventana case, Roche sat on its initial hostile offer of $75 a share for some seven months before raising its price to $89.50 and buying the U.S. group for $3.4 billion. "We have laid out our case comprehensively in the tender offer. It is now up to the shareholders to decide on our offer," Piller said.

I'd also like to get a list of the companys' major shareholders- that would be interesting!
Anyone whom can access it and beat me to the punch; please do- and dont be shy to post it
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 11 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 10 days ago with 14 member flags
Deadly new superbug heading for Britain!
  Posted 1 days ago with 8 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags