reply to post by dino1989
We do need evidence, one more piece, in order to not only take this to court, but to convince people of the validity of our claims as well as to
force, by law, a new criminal investigation.
This is the same evidence that FEMA, NIST, the 9/11 Commission and even the new Prof. Jones paper ALL claim we need to test for, yet for some reason
NONE of them did.
These buildings were brought down by controlled demolition and yet nobody has ever tested for residual trace indicators of conventional explosives.
Now why is that? Because, if a government agency tests for it and finds it, the "official story" is over and by law, the FBI and Justice Department
MUST start a new criminal investigation.
Both NIST reports as well as the FEMA report all take care to state that they didn't run tests for residual trace elements of conventional explosives
in the remaining evidence from Ground Zero. They had to do that. If they ignore the need for the tests they appear inept. Perhaps even criminally
so. So they make up a justification not to do it. If they do the tests and lie about it, then they must publish the results of the tests in their
study, and when the fraud is exposed, suddenly they become accessories after the fact to 3000 murders. So they couldn't do that either.
So why didn't they just run the tests and show no explosives were used to blow up the buildings and thus end the 9/11 truth movement once and for
Simple: because the tests will turn out positive for trace elements of conventional explosives... and they know it.
More disturbing still is the fact that I have had on-going communications with leading researchers in the "Truth" field for a year now, begging them
to run these tests with their own samples, and they have flatly refused to do so. I was even told by someone who runs the most respected Truth site
that they didn't need more investigations and that his time would be spent lobbying congress and that I should do the same. I was told that a year
ago and his name appears on the new paper "Active Thermetic Material..." along with 2 others from his group.
Apparently they had time for all that research...
Thermite was proven to be incapable of "blowing up" or breaking up the concrete floor systems in the towers and so a while ago people like me were
looking to find evidence of what could be used to do it. Around that time they started theorizing about "nano-thermite" and "thermobaric"
devices... then lo-and-behold... they just happen to find it? These same people who won't test for conventional explosive residues yet in their paper
they clearly state not only that they didn't test for them, but they think someone "else" should?
To answer your question; test for conventional explosives residues. By law, if found, the FBI must reopen the investigation plus, no one can say that
rust and aluminum siding laying next to each other made PETN, RDX, or TNT... and that is a fact.