The Inner Worlds of Conspiracy Believers (it's ALL your fault), page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 24-5-2009 @ 04:07 PM by schrodingers dog
There has been a clearly identifiable pattern lately to try to marginalize and label conspiracy theorists into an psychologically based sub-category.

From a CT point of view this in itself screams of conspiracy.

The article:

Shortly after terrorist attacks destroyed the World Trade Center and mangled the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, conspiracy theories blossomed about secret and malevolent government plots behind the tragic events. A report scheduled to appear in an upcoming Applied Cognitive Psychology offers a preliminary psychological profile of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

A team led by psychologist Viren Swami of the University of Westminster in London identified several traits associated with subscribing to 9/11 conspiracies, at least among British citizens. These characteristics consist of backing one or more conspiracy theories unrelated to 9/11, frequently talking about 9/11 conspiracy beliefs with likeminded friends and others, taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, feeling generally suspicious toward others and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook.

“Often, the proof offered as evidence for a conspiracy is not specific to one incident or issue, but is used to justify a general pattern of conspiracy ideas,”


It is much easier to demonize a group once it has been marginalized via seemingly scientific methodology.

Goertzel says the new study provides an intriguing but partial look at the inner workings of conspiracy thinking. Such convictions critically depend on what he calls “selective skepticism.” Conspiracy believers are highly doubtful about information from the government or other sources they consider suspect. But, without criticism, believers accept any source that supports their preconceived views, he says.

“Arguments advanced by conspiracy theorists tell you more about the believer than about the event,” Goertzel says.

Swami’s finding that 9/11 conspiracy believers frequently spoke with likeminded individuals supports the notion that “conspiracy thinkers constitute a community of believers,”
(emphasis mine)

That my friends is deflection of the highest degree.

"it's not us it's you"

Truth and the facts are apparently secondary to our desire to uncover them.

What is being said here is basically that questioning authority is a result of a psychological deviation, whereas "sheeplessness" (TM pending) is apparently normal and encouraged.


We should I suppose be thanking these folks for a least throwing us a bone.

Conspiracy thinkers share an optimistic conviction that they can find “the truth,” spread it to the masses and foster social change,


Gee thanks ... we're crazy but we mean well.

Patronize much?

The study, still unpublished, shows that conspiracy believers displayed a greater propensity than nonbelievers to jump to conclusions based on limited evidence.

“It seems likely that conspiratorial beliefs serve a similar psychological function to superstitious, paranormal and, more controversially, religious beliefs, as they help some people to gain a sense of control over an unpredictable world,”


Control eh?

Not understanding, not awareness, not knowledge, not truth, but control.

I put it to you that the attempt to label us into a psychological sub-category is the ultimate control exercise!

That I take as a compliment.

We must be doing something right.


Source:
The Inner Worlds of Conspiracy Believers

[edit on 24 May 2009 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 05:36 PM by iiinvision
I guess its high time to pretend to be asleep and learn other ways to encourage people to wake up....I believe its time to focus on changing ourselves instead of others...

while I agree that many ''conspiracy theorists'' out there do fit the bill of being semi delusional, I think that many people forget that we are all mad. We are all equally insane, but some don't conceal it as well as others.

My coworkers and a steady amount of people call me crazy whenever conspiracy-esque subjects come into the conversation and I ask them to remain silent for a few minutes to fully grasp what it is I am saying.

There is so much to grasp and so much background information necessary that the average person finds it easier to marginalize and dismiss conspiracies as lunacy as opposed to digging deeper for an answer.

There is so much going on and this assault on truth itself will eventually reach a tipping point...

It incenses me to hear how people can be so automatic. Simple sayings control their minds along with emotions. Simple sayings like ''Ignorance is Bliss'' and ''They're just Crazy" allows their brain to stay lazy and save energy for other simplistic tasks like keeping track of american idol and britney.

This simplicity combined with growing zealotry scares the # out of me and outside of ATS I will continue to pretend to be asleep. I will continue to stay off the radar and only divulge what I know to people who are ready to listen and share....


reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 06:20 PM by Breifne
The term 'conspiracy theorist' is itself more associated to the individualistic study of the obscure (as in not accepted) therefore making that person appear to be outside the (accepting) 'core' of society. If anything, I would prefer the actual term be tapered out in favour of a more relevant and accepting term, something that is to be understood rather than caged and judged! (Be honest, how many people openly refer to themselves as a conspiracy theorist?)

The problem with conspiracy theorists is (by in large and IMHO) that they are less of a profitable unit than your typical John Joe that consumes what he is sold via the mass advertising network (this includes the political and commercial).

There is more chance that an informed person is more likely to demand more from their political representatives, expect more from their country in terms of diplomacy, and more likely to avoid watching the main stream's 'fake God' approach to who we are and what we want. The very fact that this represents the group think approach to living, may suggest that we all meekly submit to the rigors of living within our means and finally, when required, walk in sync over the cliff like a bunch of lemmings.

Ultimately, these lemmings just ain't that controllable of a material and as such, their credit rating needs to be downgraded once again, lol.

Unfortunately, such reports, whilst their methodologies are flawed and the outcomes not empirically validated against any standard, (meaning it's not worth its' crust within peer reviewed material) tar all CT's with the same brush and line them up against the wall to be intellectually interrogated.

As for me? I prefer Chomsky, Fisk, Parenti, and even the more humorous Rob Newman over the more extreme Alex Jones. The former is not conspiratorial in nature, but rubbed together and it is dangerous information. So my taste is with the larger scale issues, rather than the minute details that are so convoluted with circumstance and conjecture that they will never be solved, ever! We are all different with like-minded views which shows diversity. Do our Government's not want this? Oh, according to the study, ''endorsing democratic practices, feeling generally suspicious toward others and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook''. Not really it appears - where are those Lemmings when we need em?

So, such a report, whilst a little poke in the eye at the CT's, only look through blinkers and thus finds itself, if it dared look, staring at ignorance and therefore becomes the butt of the joke it had intended for the delusional.

(my rant is over ... for today).




reply posted on 24-5-2009 @ 07:35 PM by GEORGETHEGREEK
reply to post by schrodingers dog



Great stuff my friend ! A flag for the thread and a star for each of your posts.

You quality rocks !
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Main Stream Media Taking It To Far!!
  Posted 17 days ago with 22 member flags
Iranian Aircraft Carriers in the Gulf of Mexico
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags
A few questions for those of you who hate the Confederate flag
  Posted 13 days ago with 9 member flags
Why Do You Insist On Doing This?
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags
Getting off of oil.
  Posted 13 days ago with 7 member flags
***Overwhelming Debt? Here Are A Few Steps To Help!!***
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags