Starred and Flagged this thread. It is refreshing to see and hear a new angle of the whole 9/11 thing.
What you are saying is very possible, and not to be discounted. I tend to believe Bush was merely a pawn and puppet, the real movers and shakers in
the admin were Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Wolfowitz, and Rove.
Of course, at the very least, if one accepts the official story, then there should have been a trial, and heads should have rolled, as the official
story screams incompetence, dereliction of duty, negligence, and overall stupidity. After all, we know that they received a buttload of intelligence
from foreign services, yet didn't do a damn thing, and they publicly lied about it in the first place.
Let's add obstruction of justice to the official story as well, and perjury under oath. If you look at their behavior during the 9/11 commission,
well, it's self explanatory.
This lovely list of charges is simply for people who actually believe the official story in it's entirety. Those who doubt it, well, the charges
would be alot worse and darker (homicide, treason, corruption, massive destruction of property, grand larceny, stock market cheating,assault with
deadly weapons, kidnapping, attempted murder, burglary,...just for starters
The assassination attempt or possible assassination attempt is a well documented one, and one that has been overlooked alot. And of course, the
Israeli angle also is strong, given the men arrested in New York filming the disaster, Odigo's text warning to it's employees, and the Israeli spy
rings that were busted.