US Buys Flankers for Aggressor Training, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-5-2009 @ 04:02 PM by Darkpr0
MOSCOW, May 12 (RIA Novosti) - The United States has bought two Su-27 Flanker fighter jets to help train U.S. pilots to cope with the growing number of Russian 4th-generation aircraft sold around the globe, a U.S. online magazine said.

The two planes have been bought from a private Ukrainian company by the Reno-based Tac Air, which provides training and test support for the military.


Source

They're not exactly modern examples of the technology, but it's interesting to see that the United States is going to be testing some of their equipment against the aircraft itself. Though, again, I don't believe it will provide an accurate picture of modern Russian arms. I believe that we all pretty well agree that the Su-27 and F-15 are reasonably on a level playing field, and we know that the F-22 completely dominates F-15's (and it would be fair to assume similar results from other new aircraft like F-35), so I'm not sure what they're expecting to learn from the aircraft. They might be better off trying to get their paws on Su-30 variants if they want practice against Russian stuff.


reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 03:03 PM by FredT
reply to post by nastalgik



Also there was Have Drill and have Donut as well. I recenty finished reading Red Eagles and while the programs above stopped years ago, they USAF and USN have kept active. The author of the book speculates that they are still flying airframes from current gen Soviet fighters.


reply posted on 7-6-2009 @ 06:36 AM by C0bzz
reply to post by FredT



In 1989, the Soviet Union spent 400 billion dollars on Defence, in 2009 Russia spent 40 billion. The same geography does not dictate that anything is the same.



reply posted on 7-6-2009 @ 09:02 PM by FredT
reply to post by kilcoo316



Aside from your typical Eurocentric trash talking what exactly does that have to do with the topic at hand?

C0bzz
Spending levels have nothing to do with mentality, outlook, and territorial desires. In fact its worse than cold war Soviets, Putin is more of a modern Stalin.

[edit on 6/7/09 by FredT]


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 07:52 AM by kilcoo316
Originally posted by FredT
Spending levels have nothing to do with mentality, outlook, and territorial desires.


Yes... indeed...



Spending:

news.bbc.co.uk...

The top 10 military spenders:
USA $607bn
China $84.9bn
France $65.74bn
UK $65.35bn
Russia $58.6bn
Germany $46.87bn
Japan $46.38bn
Italy $40.69bn
Saudi Arabia $38.2bn
India $30.0bn
Source: Sipri. All figures from 2008.



Who is galavanting off in Iraq? Or Afghanistan? Who was making noises about invading Iran until they realised they couldn't afford it? Who was off installing long range radar and anti ballistic missile silos in central Europe?

Who has the most overseas military bases?

Who has the most aircraft carriers in the world? (mighty good at defending the continental US of A aren't they... oh wait, they're for projecting power into someone else's country).





Look in the goddamn mirror!


[edit on 9/6/09 by kilcoo316]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 17 days ago with 0 member flags