Originally posted by WWu777
Originally posted by Common Good
I dont see what the big deal here is OP.
He just callin it as he sees it.
"Sounds to me like youhave some hateful grudge against the Soggy Bottom Brothers"
W: So you think AJ is justified in calling Chomsky a "NWO shill" just because Chomsky disagrees that guns are on the rise in the UK? Isn't that
overstepping big time? That's clearly a sign of paranoid delusion.
Chomsky is far more credible, intellectual and level headed than AJ, and has a far better reputation too.
what is this? your current version of M.U.S.C.L.E men rubber toy figurine brawling match for this stage of your life?
why don't you set up a Bookie to start taking bets?
ooh ooh it's no longer the left-right paradigm it's the soothsayer-vs-soothsayer deathmatch! we've evolved to the truest form of infighting!
they're both HUMAN. they both have 'things' to say, they both 'report' on current and past events.
it's their opinions they're squabbling about.
'credibility' isn't something you just negate or bless upon someone.
being a 'nutjob' isn't something anyone with a brain broadly strokes over someone's complete life work.
if your aim is to discredit and spread popular distrust in someone, then why don't you be a man and say that's what you're doing?
My personal opinion on Jones, after listening to him for a few years, is that while he digs up all sorts of interesting infomation, that I fact check
myself, he ties it together to be a very negative picture, with no real all-encompassing end-plan except for mass genocide and spiritual death.
While those factors may come into play at specific points, I fail to blindly believe that the end result in the efforts of the ruling elite is such.
There's far more esoteric and spiritually evolutionary processes at work on the highest end of global management.
And I completely disagree with the one-sided christian mentality he works with, which, in the end all be all of his mentality's format, is the basis
of his opinions of what he observs occuring on the world stage.
Chomsky rattles around the liberal mindset so clingingly... juggling over-intellectualized analysis of the common view of history without including
the underpinnings of real agenda and aim, from a left-right paradigm that, while I get a lot of insight from the way he puts forth his positions, I
shew them almost immediately, as being either completely uninformed of what's actually occuring underneath what he's commenting on, OR he's
purposefully avoiding specific aspects of ongoings, because he's either been told to do so, or is part of the orchestration of leading underlings of
like minded thought.
Though I can see an ultimate need for his shepherding the leftist flock without alarming them to the real nature of their leaders, because that
wouldn't really be shepherding now would it?
Some people need to be pacified in a manner through how they've seen the world the majority of their life, and he gives them this.
Just as limbaugh does to the dittoheads.
Chomsky's ditto-heads are just ditto-heads that think they're not ditto-heads. Just as many Jones listeners are ditto heads without even realizing
it... Jones creates such a fearful furvor, and taps into that primal survival instinct, that people have a hard time not accumulating all his reports
into one whirlwind of impending hopelessness. Top that off with stubborn immoveable christian views.. and you're dittoed to the max.
Noam supplies them with mountains of verbage to quench the good-natured aspects of liberalism, and feeds the socialist direction that the country's
taking. This is necessary on many fronts, as many anti-socialist people may not see the complete importance of in today's state of the union,
primarily the health care sector.
and that's not JUST my opinion. Just look at how morgellons sufferers have gone from practicing professionals to destitute and homeless,
family-less.. overnight.. BEFORE the economic crisis hit.. all because the supposedly 'best medical system in the world' couldn't help them, even
thought hey took all their money.
that's a tangent though. just wait a few more months.. you'll see that topic bloom into what i'm talking about.
morgellons will DRIVE the socialization of medicine.
either way, I can see a definite need for both's positions in the current state of the world.
If Chomsky wasn't there to be that left wing magnate, that many flock to for their need for understanding or agreement, then someone else virtually
identical would fill his vacancy, as would someone to Jones' gap he'd leave if e wasn't there.
They both represent certain 'shades' of awareness, and are central in the daily national discussionary process. they both coagulate certain
demographics into a more orderly discourse.
I don't ascribe ultimately to either's rantings.... but to say "who's better, who's worse" or "who's a nutjob" or "who's a shill" is
They're both human. they're not above any of us, and they both are gonna do and act out their very nature in whatever circumstance they find
so... OP.. why don't you save it for the comment section of Fox News website articles, and give our intelligence some respect.
This isn't your pre-pubescent action-figure wrestling ring action battle.
[edit on 7-5-2009 by prevenge]