It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Attorney Thomas Lauria was interviewed today by Neil Cavuto on Fox's Your World. Lauria represents a group of secured creditors of Chrysler's. During the interview, Cavuto broached the subject of Lauria's clients being directly threatened by the White House in order to accept the deal that was being offered via the Administration in regards to Chrysler Bankruptcy. Cavuto mentioned the White House's denial of these claims and asked Lauria who was lying. Lauria stated that he has several clients that do not appreciate the amount of light that has been shed on that particular question and chose to give Cavuto a 'no further comment' on the matter. Even after being pressed, Lauria stated that he felt as though he was on the witness stand. So why wouldn't Lauria want to discuss these matters? He was the individual that initially raised these claims during a radio interview with Frank Beckmann last week. Why 'no further comment'? Who is telling the truth and who is lying? I know I really would like to learn the answer to that question, but will we ever know the REAL truth? I have formed somewhat of an opinion, but without all of the facts and "TRANSPARENCY" available, I definitely don't feel comfortable decrying my stance.....
But isn't this what Mussolini Did?