USA vs. the World, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 10-2-2005 @ 03:16 PM by EastCoastKid
As I've stated before, there are many forms of warfare. It seems China has been making plans, with an economic blow to begin with..


China and the Final War for Resources
Bill Ridley
February 9th, 2005

"What's coming will be more devastating to the U.S. economy than any nuclear strike..." - The Asia Times



I. Unrestricted War

Unrestricted War: China’s Master Plan to Destroy America is a treatise for world domination written in 1999 by People’s Liberation Army Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui. In order for China to become a dominant global power over the United States, the PLA emphasizes “The Final War over Resources”, must be won.

The Colonels state that the aggressor nation “must adjust its own financial strategy, use currency revaluation or devaluation as primary weapons, and combine means such as getting the upper hand in public opinion and changing the rules sufficiently to make financial turbulence and economic crisis appear in the targeted country or area, weakening its overall power, including its military strength. Whether it be the intrusions of hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency bandwidths understood by the American military..."

Can you imagine if U.S. military leaders or politicians made such threatening comments? People would be up in arms and demanding resignations and Congressional inquiries!

However, in another case where truth is stranger than fiction – for the most part the U.S. media and government officials are keeping a lid on this volatile story. As you are about to read, the Chinese have already positioned themselves to inflict major damage to the U.S. economy. For those few brave souls in Washington and the media who are talking, their words are ominous.

Writing in the Los Angeles Times, Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, said: "Without a comprehensive strategy designed to prevent China from becoming an oil consumer on par with the U.S., a superpower collision is in the cards." The New York Times has also weighed in stating that China’s actions threaten “the very stability of the global economy.”

The final war for the planet’s resources has already started. You name the commodity and China’s buying it and consuming it in HUGE quantities. Last year they consumed nearly half of the world’s cement, twice the world’s consumption of copper, and nearly a third of the world’s coal, 90% of the world’s steel plus nearly every other commodity you can think of has been in greater demand by China.

However in order to propel such furious economic growth, there is one key commodity you need above all the others. And if you can’t get enough of it, having all the other resources won’t matter. The most prized and sought after commodity which makes the world tick is oil. With out it, you have nothing. Your economy would be frozen and your military would be left inept.

As China’s Master Plan to Destroy America manifesto outlines, the multifaceted battle plan recommended by the Chinese military has taken shape..…

Financially: Using Currency as the Primary Weapon
www.321energy.com...




reply posted on 11-2-2005 @ 01:10 PM by Observer83
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by rm172
If we have not been paying off our debts,
what are these:

War Debt

Bob Spink: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the schedule is for repayments to the USA of War Debt incurred by Britain during and in the aftermath of the Second World War, including the line of credit and the lend-lease loan. [131690]



Ruth Kelly: The schedule for the repayments of interest and principal sums outstanding on the Second World War agreement for a line of credit and a lend-lease loan facility with the United States Government are as follows:

US$ million
December 2003 $148Million
December 2004 $145Million
December 2005 $142Million
December 2006 $83 Million

These are the last 4 payments on a loan we have been paying since the war, so I think we might have paid our debt.




Let's face it, what you're paying off is only a tiny fraction of what was given to you.


Your ignorant or something? Nothing is given for free, you know not US would have be any greater unless European countrys had lot of trading between em and vice versa. US isnt world center, it wouldnt be so great unless other mostly European / Japan would have trade with em, US managed to always stay as one who put sanctions but barely ever has been put any sort of sanctions against US.
And before you say US could have done it without EU, ok maybe, but same would go with EU both were industrial era areas before and end of WWII so making each other stronger was better choice for both areas.

What was given to allied countrys? Food and suplys so they could fight, well if money vs food isnt good trade then i think it would have been better to have germany occupying whole damn EU continent. Happy i was in country that got independency thanks to Germans help (of course not free!) in war vs Russia and then Allied choice to end Russian invasion to our homeland. And we have paid war debt for Russia, cause they invaded our land and we caused em signifant losses. Sweden (was neutral during WWII) suplied us mostly and country where im is Finland.


reply posted on 11-2-2005 @ 09:37 PM by rogue1
Originally posted by Observer83


Your ignorant or something? Nothing is given for free, you know not US would have be any greater unless European countrys had lot of trading between em and vice versa. US isnt world center, it wouldnt be so great unless other mostly European / Japan would have trade with em, US managed to always stay as one who put sanctions but barely ever has been put any sort of sanctions against US.
And before you say US could have done it without EU, ok maybe, but same would go with EU both were industrial era areas before and end of WWII so making each other stronger was better choice for both areas.

What was given to allied countrys? Food and suplys so they could fight, well if money vs food isnt good trade then i think it would have been better to have germany occupying whole damn EU continent. Happy i was in country that got independency thanks to Germans help (of course not free!) in war vs Russia and then Allied choice to end Russian invasion to our homeland. And we have paid war debt for Russia, cause they invaded our land and we caused em signifant losses. Sweden (was neutral during WWII) suplied us mostly and country where im is Finland.


Well, for a start I can barely understand what you're trying to say. Whatever you're saying still doesn't change the fact that the US has only ever been repaid a fraction of what they loaned. Not to mention the 250 000 US servicemen who died in Europe.

As for Finland, you were just a Nazi stooge, who took a bit from the Russians too big to swallow. Sure you beat them sorta in 1940, but who cares it didn't slow down the Soviet war machine in the slightest. Finland was a good training ground for the Soviets


reply posted on 12-2-2005 @ 03:46 AM by Observer83
Originally posted by rogue1

Well, for a start I can barely understand what you're trying to say. Whatever you're saying still doesn't change the fact that the US has only ever been repaid a fraction of what they loaned. Not to mention the 250 000 US servicemen who died in Europe.

As for Finland, you were just a Nazi stooge, who took a bit from the Russians too big to swallow. Sure you beat them sorta in 1940, but who cares it didn't slow down the Soviet war machine in the slightest. Finland was a good training ground for the Soviets


Ok, your ignonarant, you just see deaths of US servicemans and that Europe is debt for em, while Europeans lost a lot more mens in their continent conflicts, America fought many fronts during WWII. Not to forget as winner in WWII allied gained a lot, or where did all the european gold that german took for example go after WWII? I think it went to Fortnox and British banks.

Ok, so should i say US fight over its independency was one of those stooge things too and 5 million vs country with about 200 million people, we were just for target practice? If you look numbers combined to fact how much better equipment Russia had, i mean tanks, aircrafts etc. Finland barely had any fought mostly field troops and still we were able to deliver Russians big blows and even chance offensive stance in some cases. But in the end of war Russians sure could have taken over Finland by its mere size, but it didnt.
And you say Finland didnt slow Russia war machine slightest, at least it kept those who invaded Finland away and that was our part in WWII, to protect homeland keep our independency. Not to take over Russia!
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 17 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags