It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by Zaphod58
Who exactly wants to hurt us? You must never leave your house, the fear must consume you.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
You really don't read well do you. ANY PASSENGER THAT DOES NOT WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS MACHINE SIMPLY HAS TO SAY NO. This machine is NOT FOR EVERY PASSENGER to go through.
Now the plan is going nationwide. Joe Sharkey of the New York Times reports that TSA "plans to replace the walk-through metal detectors at airport checkpoints with whole-body imaging machines—the kind that provide an image of the naked body." All passengers will "go through the whole-body imager instead of the walk-through metal detector," according to TSA's chief technology officer, and the machines will begin operating soon after orders are placed this summer.
Millimeter wave technology will remain voluntary for passengers; those who do not wish to receive millimeter wave screening will undergo metal detector screening and a pat-down.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
Hey, since you have no privacy issues, let me come over to your house and rummage through your medecine cabinet and take a look at your hard drive.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
So looking at naked men, women and children to get on an airplane isn't a privacy violation in your opinion? Wow. The fact of the matter is that you tried to change the topic from a child porn issue to a privacy issue. Let me guess you are a member of the Federalist Society.
Anyway, check out the law. Manufacturing images of nude children is indeed child pornography. People have been going to jail for it.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
So looking at naked men, women and children to get on an airplane isn't a privacy violation in your opinion? Wow. The fact of the matter is that you tried to change the topic from a child porn issue to a privacy issue. Let me guess you are a member of the Federalist Society.
Anyway, check out the law. Manufacturing images of nude children is indeed child pornography. People have been going to jail for it.
Originally posted by Jack Jouett
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
I've already gone over this with you. You refuse to listen. You can clearly see that woman's private parts. If they are doing this with children then it constitutes child porn. It's a zero tolerance policy. I didn't enact it, the state did, take your argument up with them.