Obama makes unannounced stop in Baghdad, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 7-4-2009 @ 10:23 AM by xbranscombex

Obama makes unannounced stop in Baghdad


www.cnn.com
(CNN) -- President Obama made an unannounced visit to Iraq Tuesday.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. Ray Odierno, met Obama shortly after Air Force One landed in Baghdad about 4:42 p.m. local time (9:42 a.m. ET).

Obama chose to visit Iraq rather than Afghanistan because of its proximity to Turkey, which Obama just visited, said Robert Gibbs, the president's spokesman.

In addition, Obama wanted to discuss Iraq's political situation with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and Iraqi President Jalal Talibani, Gibbs said.

Mostly, however, the stop is about Obama visiting troops, he said.

Obama will meet with Odierno and with members of the U.S. military in Iraq. He will participate in the awarding of 10 medals of valor, Gibbs said.


"Our men and women who are in harm's way, either in Iraq or Afghanistan, deserve our utmost respect and appreciation," Gibbs reportedly told reporters traveling on Air Force One.
(visit the link for the full news article)



[edit: title to same as source]
Headline: Please use the original story headline from your source.

[edit on 7-4-2009 by 12m8keall2c]


reply posted on 7-4-2009 @ 10:48 AM by XXXN3O
reply to post by 12m8keall2c



Apologies.

On topic though I think that the reason this was unannounced was because someone was attempting to assassinate Obama in Turkey with a knife!??

He had an al jazeera press pass.

edition.cnn.com...

It explains in the article and it is a good reason for keeping this quiet given how dangerous Iraq is right now.



[edit on 7-4-2009 by XXXN3O]



reply posted on 7-4-2009 @ 11:13 AM by FlyersFan
Wonder if he'll admit to the troops that now that he's elected, his Iraq policy is the same as McCains campaign position was? You know .. leave tens of thousands of troops in country as 'advisors' for an unspecified length of time .. perhaps for decades.

50,000 troops ... perhaps for decades.
That's Obama's policy. It was McCains.

Betchya Obama doesn't admit it.

Huffington Post

The Huffington Post asked McCain, if he had been elected president, whether he would have implemented roughly the same plan that Obama intends to carry out in Iraq.

"Oh, I'm sure," he said, "because that's what our military and civilian leadership has recommended. I can't say exactly, but certainly it seems to me it's a viable strategy."


Anti War News

During the campaign the president spoke repeatedly of a 16 month timetable, but backed off of it almost immediately after taking office. The current plan would spell a significant cut in ground troops in 19 months, but leaves open the question of when (or even if) the Obama Administration ever intends to formally leave the nation.


Youtube - 2008 - McCain says he'd leave a presence of troops in Iraq for 100 years if necessary - like we have in Germany and Japan.



Obama promptly jumped on McCain for his statement.
But now Obama is doing the exact same thing.

USA Today June 11, 2008

Obama and aides say McCain has no plan to get troops out of Iraq. The Democratic National Committee included the 100-year comment in a YouTube video posted to spotlight McCain's appearance on Today.

Obama has pledged to have all combat troops out of Iraq within 16 months, and to not build any permanent bases there. McCain and supporters call Obama's withdrawal plan a virtual surrender of Iraq that would endanger American security in the Middle East.


So the difference between McCain and Obama on Iraq now is ..... what exactly? And the change is .... where exactly?

Will Obama tell those troops who voted for him that he is NOT holding up to his campaign pledge to bring them ALL home within 16 months of taking office?

Will Obama tell those troops that his position now is exactly the same as John McCains was during the campaign .. a position that Obama hammered McCain for?

Betchya he doesn't.


reply posted on 7-4-2009 @ 11:35 AM by SLAYER69
reply to post by FlyersFan



Well who cares if McPain would have done the same thing. Obama got to the white house then was briefed on the real issues and realized the situation was a lot more complex then his simple election promises would allow.

REALITY started to sink in.



reply posted on 7-4-2009 @ 08:10 PM by nixie_nox
reply to post by FlyersFan



There is a difference between leaving a few troops in for maintenance. (I would be more shocked if we didn't actually, not to mention playing with fire) then leaving a whole bunch of troops.

I never expected either candidate to remove all troops.
McCain wanted to contiue war, Obama wanted to leae a safety net but force the country to run for itself.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^