It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


US government forcing change in gun laws

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 04:42 AM
after the port arthur massacre in tasmania gun laws in australia were pulled tight. real real tight.
the conspiracy goes, the shooter martin bryant was too disabled to be able to handle the weapons used. it would be unlikely he was able to kill 38 people, men, women and children with his mental disabilty.
the government apparently set bryant up using mercenaries, local or foreign, to orchestrate the massacre giving the government leaverage to bring in the heavy gun laws.

with the recent spate of heavy weapon attacks one the generally innocent public throughout the US and the oncoming war on homeland weapons could the government be setting in motion the events enabling them to eradicate your right to bear arms?

posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 04:44 AM
Do you have an article proving the above mentioned story?

and yes the US government will use this to their advantage.

posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 05:01 AM
here's a links\ to the port arthur conspiracy.

Government and Media Lies Exposed

google it and you will find more

posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 05:54 AM
Crocodile tears, but no laws to curb guns

"We've got to find a way to deal with this senseless, senseless violence," Biden told the nation.

Arriving at Binghamton that evening, New York Governor David Paterson framed similar sentiments in a question: "When are we going to be able to curb the kind of violence that is so fraught and so rapid we can't even keep track of the incidents?"

But missing from the vocabulary of either leader was any reference to gun control - the words so many US politicians are afraid to utter, even in the face of mass murder.

since the US government is all about false flags wouldn't this be the perfect way of approaching an issue you americans consider so sensitive. your guns. the politicians can act all "oh its out of our control, because the constitution says we can all be gun crazy like yosemeti sam and we can't change the constitution."

well at this point the general population step up and say "senseless senseless violence must stop! put down your guns and pick up your arms."

posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 06:03 AM
so now the government are all like " you must give us the power to change the constitution and prevent this crazyness."

and all the people say "no no, that would be like peeling the face off our already heavily multi-cultural nation."

so more people die......

and the people go "ok, change it..."

posted on Apr, 6 2009 @ 02:06 PM
Only way you can get rid of guns would be to ban the police from using them also, and I don't think it will ever happen, of course unless they also go after the police and make them look like terrorists too.

See how we all end up in the same boat if we let these people try to ban guns. The government likely will never give up it's guns no matter what they say about giving up nukes or whatever.

People have a right to fairly defend themselves from tyranny or corruption or criminals.

Heavy weaponry actually would mean machine guns and rocket launchers, etc. Nobody has used machine guns, just rifles that "appear" like an AK47. Semi autos are no different than a pistol or rifle. Machine guns have been regulated for quite some time, jsut rebranding a regular gun as an assault rifle does nothing at all to turn it into such an instrument, these are semantic games and metaphors designed to mislead people.

top topics

log in