It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
... when your beloved has instructed...
Originally posted by Seekerof
Get your acts together and try to keep up with the prevailing governmental attitudes and whims.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The current name defines the implications of using national military assets for what should be law enforcement responsibilities.
Originally posted by Seekerof
"Overseas Contingency Operation"
Originally posted by Kaytagg
The militaries job is to kill the enemy. When they're not killing the enemy, they should be training to kill the enemy.
Originally posted by Seekerof
The sole use of law enforcement, whether on a national or international level, will not fully or effectively deter, interdict, and/or inhibit acts of terrorism...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
But "terrorism" is a criminal act, not an act of war.
Originally posted by Kaytagg
The military is not a recognized authority of civil law enforcement. Using them as such also violates Posse Comitatus.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
But "terrorism" is a criminal act, not an act of war. Agenda-inspired politicians are the ones who sought to convince the public it was something it's not.
We here at ATS are supposed to be immune from those political factors.