So the veil is pulled back just a little more...
And whose interests has he got at heart? Even if he (or any other Bilderberger) did have your interests at heart (-purely rhetorical, I assure you-) do you think they are going to ask you to vote on it?
A few thoughts for anyone still on the fence:
The anti-cooperation sentiment on this thread is amazing.
Not anti-cooperation. Anti-fascism.
The mantra you are using has lulled people to sleep for too long. It is based on 'If we don't unite we will fight'. Fear-mongering to manipulate. Pure and simple. This way sheeple...
But people are seeing through the ruse by thinking for themselves.
Here's a few starters as to why a global govt is the last thing we need:
Even if a OWG were benevolent, how on earth could it be run as a democracy?
a) Billions of votes to count, all with regional / national interests at heart
b) Only corporations would be large / influential enough to affect government policy
c) The media might remain free on paper - as now - but in reality they are financially beholden to a select few individuals, who would in effect become global oligarchs, controlling the flow of all information.
d) Even today democracy is an illusion. The liklihood of any given candidate being elected is directly proportional to their expenditure on media exposure. You'd just be handing even more control over to those who've amassed vast wealth - often on the back of corrupt dealings.
e) Minority groups would be voiceless.
I could go on.
(Anyone unsure about the connection between the work of the G20 and moves toward a global government might find this thread a bit of an eye-opener...)