posted on May, 1 2009 @ 12:12 AM
If you wanted to test the effects that current environmental conditions have on this planet's living creatures, than you would probably have no
other choice than using the cow. The cow is always outside in the environment. It is grouped in herds, and available at night. It lives totally on the
grass and hay it can eat in the field and is very easy to locate.
When cows are mutilated, taken are eyes,tongue,mammary (teats) and Vagina/Anus. All organs that have a direct interaction with Earth's environment.
The eyes absorb all solar radiation, the tongue is the first organ to come in contact with the Earth's plants, the mammary glands process nutrients
from what the cow eats and certainly the anus is the last place that passes nutrients that the cow digests. The vaginal canal also contains any
contact with bulls, which essentially completes most of the exposure a cow has to Earth's environment.
So, if an 'entity' wanted to take Earth's environmental 'temperature', studying these cow organs would make total sense, given that they would
provide a profile of what living creatures of this planet are consuming/absorbing in substances which are not normally on the menu. Eg.. chemicals,
radiation and whatever is floating in the atmosphere.
So, by logical conclusion, cattle mutilation is by design, on purpose by whoever or whatever wants to known information on what is really in Earth's
environment, and how it is being extracted by creatures such as cows, and perhaps humans, because we essentially eat what they do , and them as
The big question is, who wants to know?, and who is it?
Seems funny that the government would do this, because if they wanted to, they would just use the animals on government reservations and that would
avoid exposure by farmers losing livestock..... Jury anyone?