posted on May, 18 2009 @ 12:23 PM
reply to post by GenRadek
And you claiming that it could have been therm*te, nano-therm*te, super duper-double-secret-micro-nano-teeny-tiny therm*te, is only speculation and
holds as much water as me claiming it was invisible fairies using magic pixydust in conjunction with the little gremlins that live insde all
skyscrapers of America causing problems that brought down the WTCs. Why not? You didnt see them did you? They didnt want to be seen. They were
invisible. But how do you know they werent there? I say they were because they must exist! Prove me wrong
How can I prove you wrong? Oh very simple....
1. I get my handy dandy Fairy Dust forensic chemical test as created by Tinkerbell. She is good at making things you know.
2. I test as much steel as I can from each building especially at key structural points and junctures.
3. When my Fairy Dust test kit samples results are analyzed and they are returned to me showing no fairy dust, I can then state with confidence that
there was no fairy dust used.
How can you prove conclusively that no explosive devices were used be it c-4, tnt, or thermite to assist gravity in the destuction of the towers? You
SHOW US THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF THOSE TESTS!
But wait, you can't. No tests were completed to determine if explosives were used.
Hell, even NIST didn't model the global collapse because it was too chaotic.
They didn't even scientifically prove the global collapse should have taken place but instead agreed to the Bazant paper. Mind you that one of the
scientists who authored the paper can't even apply Newton's Law to buildings despite it being a universal law of nature.
NIST steel samples weren't hot enough. Their lab tests only got sagging floors and no failure based upon the temperatures recorded.
That is why the point remains and should be investigated. Why? Because it wasn't investigated! Forensic science.
So the world, not just the truth movement, is left with eyewitness statements, chemical forensic analysis of dust samples, physics, and Newton's law
to explain the global collapse. And all of the above point to explosive devices and the need for a new investigation.