QUOTE:
Within weeks after the trial, the Los Angeles Free Press ran a story by reporters Lillian Castellano and Floyd Nelson that resurrected the possibility
of another gunman at the crime scene. They had photographic "proof" of two extra bullet holes in the wooden divider between the sets of swinging
doors at the west end of the Ambassador Hotel pantry. A freelance photographer taking generic crime scene pictures had taken the photos innocently,
they said.
With all of Sirhanís alleged eight bullets already accounted for by the LAPD, wouldnít this mean, they asked, that another gun had shot that night?
Dan Moldea agrees that such a find would have been the revelation of the ages: "The discovery of even one extra bullet could prove that more than one
gun had been fired."
There was a catch. The police had removed the door jamb in question from the Ambassador Hotel kitchen on June 28, 1968, ten months before the Free
Press saw the photos and published the article. The door jamb had been destroyed. When the Los Angeles City Council, under pressure, demanded an
answer why the piece had been done away with, Assistant Police Chief Daryl Gates responded. True, he said, there had been holes on that particular
section of the doorframe and, yes, the police thought they might have been bullet holes. They brought the section back to headquarters for x-ray
examination, but after the tests proved (quote Gates) "absolutely nothing," there was no reason to hold onto dead lumber.
When the council asked to see the x-rays, Gates shrugged. They, too, had been done away with, he replied.
Confounding the issue was the incessant question as to how Kennedy was shot in the back by a man who approached him from the front. All witnesses
testified that Kennedy fell facing Sirhan. The assassinís gun arm was pinned down by maitreíd Uecker after two shots; it continued to squeeze the
trigger on impulse or otherwise; but, witnesses claim, even though the remaining shots went askew Kennedy at no time turned his back to the weapon.
"When confronted with this point, LAPD officials had referred instead to the panic and confusion that broke loose inside the pantry while Sirhan was
emptying his .22 revolver into the crowd," Dan E. Moldea writes. "(The police said) eyewitnesses lacked the training and experience necessary to
make their story credible."
As to any guesses who a "second gunman" could have been -- someone close enough to inflict a near "hit" on RFK ñ there was only one suspect: Thane
Eugene Cesar, the Ace Security guard. Holding onto the senatorís right elbow and remaining virtually half-beside him, half-behind him in the
procession through the pantry, Cesar was strategically positioned to pump a bullet or two into Kennedy when all hell broke loose. Moldea thinks Cesar
was incapable of such a crime, but he does admit that the guard did have a "motive, means and opportunity".
When the firing began, Cesar was at point-blank range of Kennedy; and one eyewitness claims to have seen Cesarís gun smoking; although he carried a
.38 caliber service revolver, he did own a .22 at the time; he had publicly denounced the Kennedys; and he was on duty when Sirhan Sirhan managed to
slip into the out-of-bounds pantry.
But, in his behalf, many important facts support his innocence. He had no criminal record; volunteered to be questioned; offered to submit his gun for
investigation; voluntarily told the police about the .22 he owned; easily agreed to be questioned and given a polygraph test; remained openly honest
about his political sentiments; and, most important, he had not been scheduled to work that night, but was called in at the last minute.
Cesar had ñ you pardon the expression ñ come under fire many times for his fated time and place in history ñ what Moldea analogously calls being
"caught in the crossfire of history." But, suspicion has weakened during the last decade. Tongue in cheek, Cesar once stated, "Just because I donít
like the Democrats, that doesnít mean I go around shooting them."
Much of the controversy generating from the June 5, 1968, assassination has been kept alive because of the LAPDís reluctance to keep the case from the
public and its case files under wrap. These "secret files," as they were called, were eventually opened to the public in the later half of the
1980s, thanks to the hard work by and pressure from Dr. Philip H. Melanson (political science professor at the University of Massachusetts and
co-author of Shadow Play) and George Stone (research aide to attorney Lowenstein).
The LAPD released a heavily censored version of its records in early March 1986, but it was full of blackened-out lines and missing material. This
probably did more to revive the tales of conspiracy than squelch them. On a second blast to the system, this time accompanied by Paul Schrade and
leagues of others in the politics, arts and sciences, Melanson and Stone demanded the police unlock the files in entirety.
"On April 19, 1988, twenty years after the assassination, disclosure of the primary case file was finally achieved," write Melanson and his
co-author, William Klaber in Shadow Play. "The archives were under the direction of state archivist John Burns, who oversaw the sorting and
cataloging of the fifty-thousand pages of material."
But, the event proved to be less than expected. The files do not contain any reference to the tests done on the bullet-pocked pantry door frame nor
the x-rays taken of it. Stranger, all records of the trial proceedings referring to the testimony of seven forensic experts about the crime scene have
disappeared.
Los Angeles Coroner Thomas Noguchi conducted the official autopsy on the body of Robert Francis Kennedy on the morning of July 6. This very
experienced coroner removed one intact bullet and fragments from another. The operation was witnessed by, according to writer Dan Moldea, "three
forensic pathologists from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington and by two of Noguchiís associates."
In his resulting 62-page report, Noguchi stated that the shot that killed RFK "had entered through the mastoid bone, an inch behind the right ear and
had traveled upward to sever the branches of the superior cerebral artery." The largest fragment of that bullet lodged in the brain stem.
Another shot had penetrated Kennedyís right armpit and exited through the upper portion of his chest at a 59-degree angle. The coroner determined that
the senatorís arm must have been upraised when that bullet entered.
Yet, another, a third, shot entered one-and-a-half inches below the previous one and stopped in the neck near the sixth cervical. This is the bullet
that was found intact.
Checking Kennedyís clothing, for other telltale signs, Noguchi followed the path between two bullet holes in his suit coat and announced that a fourth
bullet had been fired at the senator. It entered and exited the fabric without touching the senator.
The autopsy, having clarified what bullet actually killed the publicís beloved Bobby, also created a controversy. Sirhan Sirhan had carried an
Iver-Johnson eight-cylinder handgun, the chamber having expended all eight cylinders ñ in other words, fired all eight bullets. Four of those had been
fired at RFK ñ the public accepted that ñ but there were five others who had been wounded in the pantry. Elizabeth Evans, Ira Goldstein, Paul Schrade,
Irwin Stroll and William Weisel. Because there were more victims than accounted-for bullets, a "second gunman" theory was born
www.crimelibrary.com...

