posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 04:16 PM
reply to post by Seymour Butz
Craters are proof of collapse? Where's the proven reference for this in any collapse? A debris pile is proof of collapse, not craters. Just more
BS passed off as fact.
ALL REFERENCED PROVEN FACTS ARE EVIDENCE. Sure I have plenty of opinions on the subject, but that would require more in depth research. I've spent
years dealing with this subject and not putting in any more extensive research because of scamming BS. The ALREADY REFERENCED PROVEN EVIDENCE IS
If you keep asking the same questions dealing in what if, couldas, maybes, I'm forced to repeating the same response at least until I get a warning
and some moderator can explain the acceptable procedure dealing with slightly different phrasing BS (Bogus Science) repeated over and over and over...
Not to worry, I'm sure I'll be the one getting the warning, if history repeats itself. Interesting.
But, ifs, maybes, could be, etc, et al are not my field. I DEAL IN REFERENCED PROVEN FACTS.
Craters are proven referenced facts.
One does not need to know the exact size to know what was done FROM VERIFIED REFERENCED EVIDENCE. Like saying someone that has been murdered by a
bullet hasn't been murdered by a bullet unless you can tell the exact force/size of the bullet without having the bullet in hand. A straight through
and through circular hole is a projectile/bullet until proven otherwise. Just like massive craters, massive heat in 6 acres of earth, 2 billion pounds
of instant dust, vaporized people, impossible chlorine fueled anearobic fires, wilting spires, hiroshima cancer effects, BILLIONS OF TRITIUM UNITS and
even more evidence is a NUKE until proven otherwise. All are textbook classic examples for a nuclear event - individually and in total.
[edit on 15-2-2009 by EdWardMD]