Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by RFBurns
You haven't answered my question, do you know of any case of not publishing the complete datasets from the rovers?
ArMap, they are all over the MER raw dataset sites. In some datasets, particularly those that look at the ground nearby the rovers, are datasets with
far more than just 1 filter. And in others, just the datasets with the blue UV filter...ie L7 and R1. And usually, those datasets are looking at
something interesting, you know...not just rocks next to the wheels of the rovers.
That answers the question. I am also not the only one who has noticed that too. I am not the only person who questions NASA btw. As I stated, there
are millions of others who do as well. I just so happen to be on that side of the fence who do not take NASA at their word.
Michael Malin, of Malin Space Science Systems, has also been proven to hold back data from the MGS orbiter. Huge email and letter campaigns were done
to shake loose those MOC images that sat in a drawer for months, and all of those that were held back showed very interesting things...like the
"bushes", the "worms" and the "trees" MOC strips.
Now if you want me to go do leg work for you or anyone else..sorry that isnt going to happen. If you and others have been following NASA's projects
and probes for any length of time, then you already know the scoup. I dont need to be, nor will I be, the one that 'must' provide that evidence. Its
everywhere, plastered on thousands of independant research sites, testimony from former NASA/JPL/MSSS employees, and even testimony from current
employees.
It should not bother anyone for people to believe in what they believe to be true, and it should not bother anyone that there are folks who do not
just take NASA at their word given 30+ years of hiding stuff, telling contradicting stories, and all the evidence and testimony to prove the
obvious.
But funny how the derail effort continues. You fellas seem to forget I used to do exactly what your attempting here...which is why it wont work on me.
It might to others, and you can pat yourselves on the back for succeeding to run them off..but guess what...your mucking with the G right here...and
wont succeed.
I know every little trick, every little diversion tactic, every little sneaky game. Might as well give it up because none of you will be able to even
come close to making me or others who are on to the derail effort believe otherwise. It should not ruin your worlds whatsoever about us. If it
does..well that suggests only one thing....were more right than you want to prove us wrong and that just erks the chains.
Sorry, but thats the way it is. That is why this site exsists. That is why people come here to question, to inquire, to discover, and to have the
freedom to explore alternatives besides the same old lame explanations.
There are sites for those who remain in the box fellas. They cater to only those who follow the lead duck in that straight and narrow line. They do
not allow for outside the box thinking or alternatives. They follow NASA verbatim and never deviate. I suggest that if those of us who participate in
alternative discussion just bothers the straight and narrow that much, to try those other sites that do not allow for such alternative discussion.
Might save you all some time and wasted effort trying to convince us to let go of our freedom of thought and freedom to explore the alternative.
The more we are resisted, the more we become presistant.
Cheers!!!!
[edit on 22-2-2009 by RFBurns]