CNN: Could smoking pot raise testicular cancer risk?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 06:53 AM by Anonymous ATS
Looks like it's not just CNN reporting on this.

Cannabis linked to testicular cancer

The soaring rate of testicular cancer in the UK and other Western countries is linked today to the increased popularity of cannabis. Testicular cancer has more than doubled over the past 30 years and its rise parallels that of the use of cannabis, Britain's most popular illegal drug.



reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 08:05 AM by TheRealDonPedros
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



Is there not "soaring" cancer rates straight across the board? Considering we have been smoking cannabis since we could figure out how to smoke plants, I would say its more of a combination of sedentary lifestyle, preservatives, and pollution in general.

But, by all means, don't question the fact that our economy, that relies on "perpetual GDP growth" would be in terrible danger if people started smoking more and buying/doing less.

Some call it lazy, I call it "being contemplative" and its what this world needs more than anything.

Peace

[edit on 9-2-2009 by TheRealDonPedros]



reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 08:08 AM by Dramey
simple answer is yea probably but i like to look at things logically

the logical answer is, yea it probably does, but by how much?

there isnt really much out there that doesnt raise some type of cancer risk, one day tomatoes decrease risk, the next is raises it, my point is, any study or test or whatever these people want to call it can all be done in order to come up with the desired outcome

theres a million of these types of studies

what we should ask ourselves is why is this knowledge being publicized now?

the simple answer is, the good old human dolphin mr. phelps

right now support for marijuana is very high (excuse the pun)

pretty much the majority of america understand marijuana and support its medical development

but the powers that be, that we always talk about, they realize they need to do something to stifle that sentiment among its citizens, so things like this are put out, soon im sure there will be some case that comes out and says hemp isnt as industrially valuable as previously thought, or if used, its going to cause some agricultural meltdown, or whatever else they can come up with as ammunition to throw at a ridiculous outdated cause

this is just one more thing they can point to and say, we need further study on these results before changing laws any further to insure the safety of the citizens, its just a made up piece of evidence to use to back their position, the same kinds of studies can be done on anything

i mean look at alcohol and tobacco and all the studies on those about cancer


so just because marijuana has this as a side effect we should forget about all the medicinal properties it contains

but if w applied that logic to all pharmaceuticals

what pharmaceuticals would still be on the market?

even acetaminophen is responsible for more deaths then marijuana and has potentially more dangerous side effects


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 08:13 AM by Dramey
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Looks like it's not just CNN reporting on this.

Cannabis linked to testicular cancer

The soaring rate of testicular cancer in the UK and other Western countries is linked today to the increased popularity of cannabis. Testicular cancer has more than doubled over the past 30 years and its rise parallels that of the use of cannabis, Britain's most popular illegal drug.


saw this after posting my post

just wanted to say

of course its not just cnn, the propaganda machine has been started

i mean we all know propaganda over marijuana has been going on since the begining, but now that such a elite young role model to many young children has put all of this on the front page, they need something to counter the effects his story and situation will have on young minds along with the rest of us


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 09:14 AM by keeb333
Come on people, this is obviously a poor attempt at "crowd control" -- propaganda designed solely to put fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) into the mind of the public after the Michael Phelps thing.

Too many people have had the attitude of "So what? It's just weed. Oh, and if he can be a smoker and still win 8 gold medals, than how bad can the stuff be exactly? He seems pretty motivated and unlazy -- quite the opposite of all those anti-drug ads that run all the time. Maybe the government isn't telling us the truth!"

And of course, they're not...

The big bad government can't have people know the truth that the drug that's been banned for most of the last century is not particularly harmful, and that everyone who smokes is a complete degenerate.

The article itself is completely speculative, and statistics can be manipulated to show anything. Plus, there is actually substantial evidence that MJ prevents cancer rather than causes it!

The worst thing about MJ is that it is illegal. That is what causes people's lives to be destroyed and become paranoid. Take away the legal repercussions, and what are you left with? A harmless plant, unlike alcohol which is legal and still manages to destroy people's lives pretty well!

The government just doesn't want to lose their unconstitutional revenue stream from all the seizures and fines paid, but they don't seem to realize that legalizing and regulating the stuff would provide a whole new industry for the country, creating jobs, and providing tax money.

Legalization is a winning situation for everyone. Prohibition is only a win for the government, and only a marginal one at that because of the organized crime that has grown to meet the demand for the illegal plant.

Which brings me to another question: exactly where in the Constitution does it say that the federal government shall have the power to forbid citizens from growing, in their homes or on their property, any type of plant they arbitrarily pick (no scientific studies were done before the original act banning MJ; the law was passed simply by using racist FUD to railroad it through - but that's a whole other topic!), especially if there is no commerce, let alone interstate commerce, involved?

I just can't understand how the courts have upheld this blatant abuse of the interstate commerce clause as justification for what the gov has been doing to people!

The only people that should be in prison are CRIMINALS....and a crime must have a victim. This so called "legislation of mroality" has got to stop! We are adults and should be allowed to decide for ourselves what we put into our bodies.

And before the whole "they're not just hurting themselves" crowd chimes in. there are already laws on the books for what happens when you hurt somebody else. They just need to be enforced!

Legalization would help ameliorate many of this county's problems. I can't understand why there is so much resistance to the idea, especially when about half the country has at least tried the stuff at some point in their lives!\
Pages:     ^^TOP^^