It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because HAARP is a ULF (Ultra-Low-Frequency) band, where a 1/4 wavelength vertical antenna (typical for virticals) would be over 150 feet in lenght. That would be rather difficult to tote around coming out the end of your cell phone. Not to mention that circuitry needed to create radio waves in that range is also rather large.
Originally posted by jcspock If HAARP can communicate with submarines at sea, wouldn't it be able to be used as a new form of wireless cellular-phone technology?
Originally posted by jcspock
Sorry, I just realized I posted this in the wrong section, should be in Science & Technology.
Just a question, feel free to call me an idiot if you like.
Question: If HAARP can communicate with submarines at sea, wouldn't it be able to be used as a new form of wireless cellular-phone technology?
Shouldn't the telecoms be fighting for frequency rights?
Seems like there would be a lot of money to be saved if you didn't need to pay for satellites to route your cell-phone signal from.
[Edited on 13-4-2004 by jcspock]