It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The World Is NOT Safe!

page: 2
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 03:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by sezsue
reply to post by bobbylove321

But instead of Nukes, I think it will more likely be the release of some manufactured disease such as "bird flu" or smallpox or spanish flu....which will cause allow the country to be "reused" after clean-up.

You know military scientists have been messing around with stored smallpox virus lately and recently found a frozen body killed by spanish flu in Alaska that they have gotten the virus from and they are messing with it.

After all, there is a conspiracy theory out there that the spanish flu was engineered to start with, and spread amongst the soldiers who spread it to their loved ones while returning home. Most of the people who died were young men and women not old and very young who are usually killed by flu.

(Of course if that was true, it would mean military leaders experimented on our own soldiers, and they would NEVER do that, would they?)

Nukes would be too messy and too dangerous. After all, why ruin the whole country and make it unlivable.

Oh, and isn't there a conspiracy theory about how the PTB want to drastically reduce the population?

Can you say, kill two birds with one stone?
 

spelling


[edit on 11-2-2009 by sezsue]


You're probably right, but I think a war type effort would be the first phase. This way they can still blame the middle east and continue with the plan. Disease comes after that and blame it on the dead.




posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 03:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by sezsue
reply to post by bobbylove321

(Of course if that was true, it would mean military leaders experimented on our own soldiers, and they would NEVER do that, would they?)

Can you say, kill two birds with one stone?
 

spelling


[edit on 11-2-2009 by sezsue]


Experiments on US soldiers now admitted

As for killing two birds with one stone, how about 6.2 billion
birds with 6 stones ?

The Georgia Guidestones - 500 Mil population cap

Evil didn't die, it lived on and is growing in strength everyday.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by ThatDGgirl
 


and maybe you missed finance 101. the more money they print the less its worth.


But that's just it. New currency, new government. Out with the old.


back to finance 101. to be worth something money has to be backed in something valuable. in our currency that is currently gold. the value of money is determined by the amount of gold its worth. unless your new government has a way to mass produce bars of gold i doubt they will make it anywhere.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 12:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ex_MislTech

Experiments on US soldiers now admitted

As for killing two birds with one stone, how about 6.2 billion
birds with 6 stones ?

The Georgia Guidestones - 500 Mil population cap

Evil didn't die, it lived on and is growing in strength everyday.



of course amry experiments on soldiers. MK-Ultra. Agent Orange. Nukes. all these things were tested on american soldiers. but let me say it again. a mass wipeout will not solve anything nor will it happen. the NWO isnt gonna kill 6.2 billion people so that it can have earth all to itself.



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 01:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by N. Tesla

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by ThatDGgirl
 


and maybe you missed finance 101. the more money they print the less its worth.


But that's just it. New currency, new government. Out with the old.


back to finance 101. to be worth something money has to be backed in something valuable. in our currency that is currently gold. the value of money is determined by the amount of gold its worth. unless your new government has a way to mass produce bars of gold i doubt they will make it anywhere.


Why would they need to produce mass amounts of gold? USA is about 56 trillion in debt, including pension, medicare etc. Just drop the current currency, create a new one and then bring back the gold standard. It would be just like the good 'ole days 25 cents/hour and you could buy a piece of pie for 5 cents.



[edit on 13-2-2009 by FlySolo]



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 01:32 PM
link   
reply to post by FlySolo
 


Oh, I think they could still blame the Middle East based soley on a biological attack.

Two recent events come to mind - Al-Qaida militants dying of bubonic plague as well as two frozen mice infected with bubonic plague missing from a US research facility.

Here are the weblinks:

Al-Qaida Militants dead - Bubonic Plague

and

Missing Mice Infected with Bubonic Plague



posted on Feb, 13 2009 @ 02:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by N. Tesla

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by N. Tesla
reply to post by ThatDGgirl
 


and maybe you missed finance 101. the more money they print the less its worth.


But that's just it. New currency, new government. Out with the old.


back to finance 101. to be worth something money has to be backed in something valuable. in our currency that is currently gold. the value of money is determined by the amount of gold its worth. unless your new government has a way to mass produce bars of gold i doubt they will make it anywhere.


BTW,

I forgot to mention that the states dropped the gold standard back in '33.



Ben Bernanke and Harold James, in a paper called "The Gold Standard, Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great Depression: An International Comparison" published in 1991 (NBER working paper version here), noted that 13 other countries besides the U.K. had decided to abandon their currencies' gold parity in 1931. Bernanke and James' data for the average growth rate of industrial production for these countries (plotted in the top panel above) was positive in every year from 1932 on. Countries that stayed on gold, by contrast, experienced an average output decline of 15% in 1932. The U.S. abandoned gold in 1933, after which its dramatic recovery immediately began. The same happened after Italy dropped the gold standard in 1934, and for Belgium when it went off in 1935.

Link
So actually, the money today is backed by, well, nothing. Money isn't even really printed it's just picked out of thin air and entered in on a computer as credit.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join