AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the General Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Pentagon clears ITSELF of propaganda violations




Topic started on 18-1-2009 @ 12:01 PM by baseball101


hello .... searched ATS and i didn't come up with any other threads about this ... and if this is in the wrong forum please re-direct .... this screams conspiracy why would the Pentagon admit of the propaganda violations on itself ... that would make all the ignorant people lose faith in their government haha just my personal opinion .... i'm pretty sure everyone here knows that the Pentagon has put out some sort of propaganda about the war in Iraq ... just search the site ... here's the article link at bottom ...

An internal investigation has cleared the Pentagon of violating a ban on domestic propaganda by using retired military officers to comment positively about the war in Iraq in the US media.

In a report posted on its website Friday, the Pentagon's inspector general said "we found the evidence insufficient to conclude that RMA (retired military analysts) outreach activities were improper."

The report said the controversy, which erupted in April following an expose in the New York Times, warranted no further investigation.

The Times found that the Pentagon laid on special briefings and conference calls for the retired officers, many of whom then repeated the talking points as military experts on television news shows.

It also found that many of the media analysts also worked as consultants or served on the boards of defense contracting companies, but that those ties often went undisclosed to the public.

US law bars government agencies from using funds for domestic propaganda, but the inspector general's report said the definition of propaganda is unclear.

The report said historically it has been interpreted to mean publicity for the sake of self aggrandizement, partisanship, or covert communications, and that by those standards the evidence did not show a violation of the ban.

"Further, we found insufficient basis to conclude that (the office of the assistant secretary of defense for public affairs) conceived of or undertook a disciplined effort to assemble a contingent of influential RMAs who could be depended on to comment favorably on DoD (Department of Defense) programs," it said.


Full Article Here



[edit on 18-1-2009 by baseball101]

[edit on 18-1-2009 by baseball101]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more General Conspiracies topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 18-1-2009 @ 12:31 PM by redhead57


This is a joke. Much like in many cities around the world, where the police do their own investigations of abuse, like they are going to admit wrongdoing????

What irks me to no end is how naive they think the American people are. Lazy, uncommitted to change and honest government...yes.....naive....no.



   copyright & usage 
















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.039 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]