I'm a little bit confused about weapons of mass destruction and who is allowed to accuire, develop and have these various forms of WMD's
Primarily I am talking about nuclear weapons, but chemical and biological weapons are also covered. This topic is way too big for one post. And
anyones help on the topic would be appreciated.
First off I do believe that Saddam Hussien was a delusional madman and the best thing for the people of Iraq was to remove him from office.
How ever I do not agree with the current occupation and how the war was waged.
We all know what the pretense for military action in Iraq was by the USA and coalition of the willing. Iraq possessed and was devolping WMD's and was
involved with the September eleven 2001 incident.
What I am confused about is the "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty" which is aimed at stopping the spread of neclear weapons around the world.
189 countries around the world have signed this treaty with five of those counties having nuclear weapons in their possession.
Three countries, India, Israel and Pakistan have never signed the treaty, North Korea signed the treaty but withdrew after violating it and are all
believed to have neclear weapons.
According to leaked intelligence, Israel has been developing nuclear weapons at its Dimona site in the Negev since 1958, and many nonproliferation
analysts like David Albright estimate that Israel may have stockpiled between 100 to 200 warheads using the plutonium reprocessed from Dimona.
The Israeli government refuses to confirm or deny possession of nuclear weapons, although this is now regarded as an open secret after Israeli low
level nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu—later abducted and jailed by Israel—revealed the program to the British Sunday Times in 1986.
Now lets look at what they say about Iran.
The IAEA has been able to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran, and is continuing its work on verifying the absence of
As recently as October 2007, IAEA Director General ElBaradei reported that IAEA inspections had not found any evidence that Iran was making nuclear
Russia further said in November 2007 that it had not seen any evidence of Iran trying to build a nuclear weapon.
 In February 2008, the IAEA reported that all declared nuclear material remained accounted for. However, the IAEA also reported that it was
working to address "alleged studies" of weaponization, based on documents provided by certain Member States, which those states claimed originated
Please take note of the last sentence as I find it quite interesting.
However, the IAEA also reported that it was working to address "alleged studies" of weaponization, based on documents provided by certain Member
States, which those states claimed originated from Iran
Certian member states, I would really like to know who supplied this info that originated from Iran.
Now lets look at the bigger picture.
Israel has never signed this treaty and is known to have nuclear weapons.
Iran have signed this treaty and are devoloping nuclear power for peacefull reasons.
So why all the fuss over Iran and not Israel?
The way Israel is acting, it should be named a rouge state and treated as such, they think they can get away with anything and act as such.
If the USA has the right to invade and occupy Iraq for WMD's, The nations of the world have the right to invade Israel and occupy it aswell.
Peace will never be attained in this region of the middle east with Israel acting the way they are. They dont really seem to want peace. Israel is a
failed nation that should never have been implemented in the first place. The United Nations needs and must do some thing to fix the problem the
League of Nations and England caused.
The day that Israel uses nuclear weapons, will be the day it is too late to fix the problem. The crimes against hummanity that are being commited now
show us how the Israeli government and military think, do you think its a safe world with them having nuclear weapons. I don't.