Look at the dates and times of the thread you mention, any idea what might have been going on at the time of the posts or prior? let me give you a
hint, New Years celebration? possibllly some liquid refreshments, and then a little ATS, I do it all the time.
Well . . . are they?????, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 2-1-2009 @ 04:09 AM by ipsedixit
I know that we all have questions from time to time about the people who post in these forums.
Are they administration plants? Are they cute? (Sometimes avatars are helpful with this.) Are they out of their minds? (Usually jokingly asked.) Are they out of their minds? (Uttered in disgust.) Is this person out of his mind? (In ways that a psychiatrist might be familiar with and an ATS mod might be required to deal with.)
Well, I'm asking one of those questions with regard to the following thread. I'll let you decide which question I am asking as you read this short thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Are they administration plants? Are they cute? (Sometimes avatars are helpful with this.) Are they out of their minds? (Usually jokingly asked.) Are they out of their minds? (Uttered in disgust.) Is this person out of his mind? (In ways that a psychiatrist might be familiar with and an ATS mod might be required to deal with.)
Well, I'm asking one of those questions with regard to the following thread. I'll let you decide which question I am asking as you read this short thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 04:49 AM by AccessDenied
reply to post by ipsedixit
Uh..yeah. The "I know all, and I'm posting it on a message board" people...
Attention seekers. nothing more.
and usually quite hostile.
this would fall under the "better to ignore" category.
Use your own personal filters. They'll serve you well.
Uh..yeah. The "I know all, and I'm posting it on a message board" people...
Attention seekers. nothing more.
and usually quite hostile.
this would fall under the "better to ignore" category.
Use your own personal filters. They'll serve you well.
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 04:58 AM by ipsedixit
reply to post by alyosha1981
It's OK. Don't bother about it. It might be much ado about nothing, as the posters above imply. If there is anything to it, it'll be handled eventually, I'm sure.
It's OK. Don't bother about it. It might be much ado about nothing, as the posters above imply. If there is anything to it, it'll be handled eventually, I'm sure.
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 05:04 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by ipsedixit
Ok I'll just leave it alone then
I read the thread and I could'nt figure out what you were asking, I'm sorry. I was not trying to insult you in
my first post.
Ok I'll just leave it alone then
I read the thread and I could'nt figure out what you were asking, I'm sorry. I was not trying to insult you in
my first post.reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 05:05 AM by AccessDenied
Originally posted by ipsedixit
reply to post by alyosha1981
It's OK. Don't bother about it. It might be much ado about nothing, as the posters above imply. If there is anything to it, it'll be handled eventually, I'm sure.
Don't hold your breath for that.
Elvis is in the building.
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 05:20 AM by ipsedixit
reply to post by alyosha1981
No problem. Some things are a matter of perception. Maybe the situation is not as obvious or maybe it's not as much of a situation as I suspect it is.
No problem. Some things are a matter of perception. Maybe the situation is not as obvious or maybe it's not as much of a situation as I suspect it is.
reply posted on 2-1-2009 @ 03:59 PM by TeslaandLyne
Always saying he is telling but never did say anything.
And this:
".. to understand why the attacks happened in the first place. It .."
That never came out.
Double talker is the word for that person.
Spit it out man and lets us know, what level Illuminati think tank
has that much power to execute the 911 conspiracy.
Other wise we go with the official story.
Do I have to post this again:
video.google.com...
In this case going round in circles and a big crashing hangover
and lost book idea.
And this:
".. to understand why the attacks happened in the first place. It .."
That never came out.
Double talker is the word for that person.
Spit it out man and lets us know, what level Illuminati think tank
has that much power to execute the 911 conspiracy.
Other wise we go with the official story.
Do I have to post this again:
video.google.com...
In this case going round in circles and a big crashing hangover
and lost book idea.
Pages: ^^TOP^^
