It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Just heard an interview with a Pakistan General on the Alex Jones show.
He had pretty remarkable thoughts on many issues, and more will follow from Infowars.com.
But when asked about the situation with India, he said something to that effect, making clear that they will not be bullied by India over the Mumbai bombings, and will resort to nukes if India attacks them, rather than be drawn into a conventional war.
He said that would almost guarantee WW3, as China and Russia would not accept that in their own back yard.
Originally posted by Jinni
The 'general' you are talking about is Hamid Gul - He thinks 911 was an inside job and it seems he would make a great ATS member!
If India ATTACKS them then Pakistan has the full right to DEFEND themselves. Same vice versa.
Originally posted by king9072
reply to post by Jinni
WOW ON CNN THEY LET A REPUTABLE GUEST ACTUALLY CLAIM THAT 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB PERPETRATED BY THE NEOCONS.
Sorry, I had to make sure the caps were used to ensure you guys understood how shocked I am.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
But when asked about the situation with India, he said something to that effect, making clear that they will not be bullied by India over the Mumbai bombings, and will resort to nukes if India attacks them, rather than be drawn into a conventional war.
Originally posted by Jinni
He said a Conventional War is not possible between the parties because they are nuclear powers...
Can you indicate in the videos where he said what you claim he has said?
That would certainly clear things up!
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Jinni
He said a Conventional War is not possible between the parties because they are nuclear powers...
Can you indicate in the videos where he said what you claim he has said?
OP title:
'Pakistan General: 'We'll nuke India, no conventional war.'
I'm not too far off the mark there, and I was paraphrasing from memory after listening to the show initially on the radio. That's why I stuck this in skunk works, cause I wasn't sure, and didn't use full quotes. Also, that guy was pretty hard to understand on the reduced bit rate streamlink I was listening to. I haven't watched these videos yet, but I would assume the radio show audio would be the same. The video's audio maybe better, dunno.
That would certainly clear things up!
Hope that helps, and sorry to confuse anyone. But again, if I was sure, and this wasn't to some degree speculation, it would not be in skunk works.
But when asked about the situation with India, he said something to that effect, making clear that they will not be bullied by India over the Mumbai bombings, and will resort to nukes if India attacks them, rather than be drawn into a conventional war.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by Jinni
From OP:
But when asked about the situation with India, he said something to that effect, making clear that they will not be bullied by India over the Mumbai bombings, and will resort to nukes if India attacks them, rather than be drawn into a conventional war.
[edit on 10-12-2008 by TrueAmerican]
Originally posted by Jinni
He said that it would not be possible to conduct a totally non-nuclear conventional war any more (referring to both parties).
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Jinni
He said that it would not be possible to conduct a totally non-nuclear conventional war any more (referring to both parties).
Right, which means (to me) that they will resort to nukes.
And if you're going to use nukes, why use conventional war at all beforehand? Just to see how much they can piss each other off??
So that further means (to me) that Pakistan is disposed to use nukes, first.
[edit on 10-12-2008 by TrueAmerican]
Originally posted by Jinni
My point is that either side MAY resort to using Nukes but you keep picking out Pakistan and not India on this matter.
I find that a bit CNN\FOX.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Jinni
My point is that either side MAY resort to using Nukes but you keep picking out Pakistan and not India on this matter.
I find that a bit CNN\FOX.
lol, no, I am quite aware that it's both sides (ffs), but this is coming from a Pakistani general, not from India. And I am trying to make the point (obviously in vain here) that once nukes are considered it is really only giving India one option- to nuke first- IF they are going to attack first.
My last post regarding your confusion, for sure. Look, u2u a mod and request a thread title change on this if you like. I could really care less. I know what the implications are of what I heard. And you know the same. We're just arguing semantics at this point. And no, no videos for me yet. Need more time.