Originally posted by serbsta
Doesnt imply, prove anything in my opinion.
1. His speech is sloppy and he honestly sounds like a nut. -1
well observed. one star for you.
2. He has trouble making fluent sentences. -1
you're honing your observational skills. this means two stars for you.
3. He used the words Zionism, Illuminati and Obama in the same sentence, whether any of that is REALLY related, someone who KNOWS what theyre talking
about wouldnt blatantly blurt out something like that, it just doesnt make sense. -1
errr.. well someone who KNOWS what they're talking about wouldn't, say something UNLIKE that, now wouuuld they?
or wait, would they say something LIKE that...
let's take a poll and find out if people who know what they're talking about actually saaaay things... like..."that"...
nice try.
I "blatantly blurt" often.
and so do you.
like...
4. Just because the person who wrote the transcript knew how to spell Illuminati properly doesn't imply anything at all
........
its very likely that they've simply heard of them, read up on them just like millions of other people all over the world. -1
wait that was an implication.
eeeeyup yeah.. you just implicated that the guy that typed "Illuminati" has "heard" of them.. and "read up on them".. and "posted them on
C-SPAN's actual website for all the world to see in pure red white and blue.. and for governmental record keeping's sake.
yeaaa doesn't implicate a thiiiing...
-4 to whatever the point of this was. That guy needs to lay of the drugs.
cheap lackadaisically posted 4th point, leaning on assumptions and false accusations.
you loose..
it's all in fun though.
-
[edit on 9-12-2008 by prevenge]