Originally posted by TheDarkFlame
Any Country in South America except maybe Peru, Chile and Argentina. They all have extensive natural resources many still unexploited. Some contires
also produce more food than their population can actually consume. Still they come with a whole nother group of problems. If you feel you can handle
life in the tropics its a good choice.
Note. Argentina and Chile are to dependent on other countries for their food. Except for beef in Argentina. Peru is the toilet of the world.
In my advice go to Colombia, GET A WORKING VISA BEFORE YOU DO, live in a city like Bogota, Medellin or Cali (things have changed allot in the last 10
years.). As a foreigner you should be able to get a descent job. Besides the police wouldn't be able to control the population thus throwing the
country into social unrest if situation x occurs. The perfect scenario for a opportunist and survivalist.
Let me respectfully disagree...
I would choose Chile, why?. Because I have already lived there, it is the most stable economy of south america and unlike your uninformed opinion it
is the most self sufficient country in the region along with Argentina. And by far the safest, by faaaarrrrr..
I would not pick Colombia, why?. Because I also have lived there. You are right things have changed and Uribe is the best president there is in the
region and the best one Colombia has so far had. But it is still plagued by violence, not in the main cities, but in the country (I guess that if you
stay in cities such as Bogotá, Medellín, Barranquilla or Cali it is all right).
Just my two cents
