1. If all it takes is a little jetfuel randomly poured near the top of a steel frame skyscraper to drop that building into it's own footprint, why
are millions spent for demolition companies to professionally do this?
And keep in mind a perfect demolition of a building into it's own footprint requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the
world will attempt it.
2. Where did the EPA samples of 1.3 Diphenylpropane come from?
One molecule, described by the EPA's Erik Swartz, was present at levels "that dwarfed all others": 1,3-diphenylpropane. "We've never observed it
in any sampling we've ever done," Swartz said. He said it was most likely produced by the plastic of tens of thousands of burning computers.
If the 1.3 DPP was due to burning computers, why was it not reviously observed “in any sampling we’ve ever done”?
For those who do not know, ultrafine aluminum and iron oxide are held in a 'sol-gel' matrix to form an explosive form of thermite used as 'cutter
charges' and 1.3 DPP is present in 'sol-gels'
3. If the metal did not melt, how would one explain the iron-rich microspheres with the same chemical signature as commercial thermite present in
Dr. Frank Gayle, NIST Metallurgy Expert: "Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people
figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it didn't, the steel did not melt."
4. Where did the "red chips" of a compound that behaves like unreacted thermite come from if no thermite was used?
5. Why was the testimony of William Rodriguez not included in the 9/11 Commission Report?
6. If we are being told the truth, why wouldn't the pentagon release all the video of what it claims is a 757 hitting the pentagon, rather than 5
frames that show anything but
a 757 hitting it? If they aren't lying, why not just show us their proof?
7. If the towers were brought down by planes hitting the upper portion of the towers, why are there videos where you can hear secondary explosions at
ground level, and eyewitness testimony stating this as well?
8. Why has no steel structure building ever collapsed due to fire before or after 9/11, yet on 9/11 three buildings supposedly did just this?
Buildings have had raging infernos for over 24 hours and not collapsed, a plane hit the empire state building and it did not collapse.
9. Why were the Bin Laden family the only ones allowed to leave the U.S. after the attacks?
10. If 15 of the 19 supposed hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, why did we go to Afghanistan and then Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia?
11. Why would Osama Bin Laden say
"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned
by people for personal reasons,"
and then come out in a video wearing jewelery (against his islamic beliefs) and eating with the wrong hand,
to claim responsibility for the attacks? (trick question, the video has been proven fake.)
12. Why would Bush claim that Osama Bin Laden was the "prime suspect" in a September 17, 2001 CNN report, when the FBI says they have “No hard
evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”?
13. How was WTC 7 rigged to be "pulled" (as Larry Silverstein said) in hours, when normally it takes months to prep a building under normal
circumstances? And why does NIST say it collapsed due to fire when we have video of Silverstein himself saying they decided to "pull it"?
14. How did WTC 1, 2, and 7 all break the laws of physics?
Just one example: Laws of Conservation of Energy and Momentum.
15. Why did the 911 Commission only analyze floors 8-46 of WTC 7?
16. When NIST reconstructed floor sections of the towers, why couldn't they get them to collapse under laboratory conditions?
17. How could the steel in the towers be weakened to the point of collapse from a fire that NIST says never exceeded 1000 degrees, when the steel used
for the buildings was certified by underwriters laboratories for temperatures of 2000 degrees for 6 hours?
18. Why did NIST stop it's computer simulations at the point where the tower is "poised to collapse"?
19. Why won't NIST release it's computer simulation software for peer revue?
20. How can you explain the plumes of dust and debris or "squibs" far below the region of the building that is "collapsing"?
21. Why was all the evidence removed from the scene of the largest terrorist attack in the history of mankind, before anyone could investigate it? Why
was it shipped to India and China rather than being stored somewhere for examination? And why wasn't FEMA's Building Assessment Performance Team
even allowed access to Ground Zero?
22. Why were towers that were designed to survive the impact and fire from a collision by a 707-340 carrying 23,000 gallons of fuel, completely
destroyed by similar- sized 767-200s that hit the towers each carrying about 10,000 gallons of fuel?
23. If the scientific method dictates that one would draw conclusions from facts that had been found, why did the 911 Commission look for facts to
support the conslusion that it had already come to, and then call this science?
24. If NIST has said in it's own words,
We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.
Why should we take
anything they say as proof of anything but their own lies and/or incompetence?
25. If Bush has admitted to lying to the White House press corps, (and he has) why should we believe anything he says?
You asked for 11, I could do this all day...
Any story with this
many holes in it could be picked apart by a half-asleep 5 year old...
[edit on 1-12-2008 by ashamedamerican]