It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One molecule, described by the EPA's Erik Swartz, was present at levels "that dwarfed all others": 1,3-diphenylpropane. "We've never observed it in any sampling we've ever done," Swartz said. He said it was most likely produced by the plastic of tens of thousands of burning computers.
Dr. Frank Gayle, NIST Metallurgy Expert: "Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it didn't, the steel did not melt."
and then come out in a video wearing jewelery (against his islamic beliefs) and eating with the wrong hand, to claim responsibility for the attacks? (trick question, the video has been proven fake.)
"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons,"
Why should we take anything they say as proof of anything but their own lies and/or incompetence?
We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.
Originally posted by thefreepatriot
...how about the initial reports of police finding explosives inside the building...??? ummmm what happened to those reports?
In its court papers, Swiss Re shows how Silverstein first tried to buy just $1.5 billion in property damage and business-interruption coverage. When his lenders objected, he discussed buying a $5 billion policy. Ultimately, he settled on the $3.5 billion figure, which was less than the likely cost of rebuilding
2 - The military from Norad intervened only after one hour and a half. It usually takes fifteen minutes or so to intercept any airplane in North America.
Originally posted by ashamedamerican
1. If all it takes is a little jetfuel randomly poured near the top of a steel frame skyscraper to drop that building into it's own footprint, why are millions spent for demolition companies to professionally do this?
And keep in mind a perfect demolition of a building into it's own footprint requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the world will attempt it.
Originally posted by LordCarpainter
jtthomas makes me sick. He is one of those debunkers who just says "That's been debunked!" without providing ANY evidence either than sending us on wild link changes. What a fraud this jthomas is.
Of course the truth makes you sick. Why else do you repeatedly post nonsense debunked up to seven years ago? Are we supposed to hold your hand? Aren't you capable of learning?
And you wonder why we laugh at you nutters?
Originally posted by ashamedamerican
9. Why were the Bin Laden family the only ones allowed to leave the U.S. after the attacks?
10. If 15 of the 19 supposed hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, why did we go to Afghanistan and then Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia?
17. How could the steel in the towers be weakened to the point of collapse from a fire that NIST says never exceeded 1000 degrees, when the steel used for the buildings was certified by underwriters laboratories for temperatures of 2000 degrees for 6 hours?
Originally posted by foremanator
Because those questions were never answered. And the answers that were given did not fit the facts.
posted by Mintwithahole.
The plane completely disappearing at the Pentagon is what really bothers me. The denyers say the plane was completely smashed to atoms because of the reinforced steel and concrete beams which grated the plane into mere nothingness. However, if that was the case what is it that carries on through the three outer circles of the Pentagon and ends by smashing a 16ft wide hole in the wall? You simply can't have it both ways?
Either the plane and it's passengers where totally destroyed by the reinforced beams and the projectile which carried on through the buildings outer rings is a total mystery or the plane wasn't completely destroyed hence their should be evidence of its existence. . .