Interesting! One thing that strikes me is that the date is from November 2002. I wonder what progress have they made since then in this technologies developement.

Originally posted by American Mad Man
(I wonder, how can we possably spend 2 billion on paint jobs??? then again, we did find some place to sell us 50 dollar hammers)

They are NOT hammers. They are hand-held, variable speed, multi-directional, impact generators. They are way more advanced than a generic hammer. That's why they cost so much.

haha, i keep imagining someone hearing a tank and seeing tank tracks headed right for them... but not actually seeing the tank.

good find, thought. that's really interesting. and like Sigma said, i wonder how much that's advanced since this article was published.

They are NOT hammers. They are hand-held, variable speed, multi-directional, impact generators. They are way more advanced than a generic hammer. That's why they cost so much.

hahahaha - ok, I didn't know - I was just being my usulual smart-ass self

Interesting! One thing that strikes me is that the date is from November 2002. I wonder what progress have they made since then in this technologies developement.

I dunno - I do know that i read somewhere that nano tech is probably 15-20 years away from being really useful, where we could do things competently with it. I will try to dig up the sight.

haha, i keep imagining someone hearing a tank and seeing tank tracks headed right for them... but not actually seeing the tank.

I get that image too - but in mine the guy tries to run away, but then runs into the invisable tank