It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rahm Emanuel - Israeli Spy

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 17 2008 @ 10:19 AM
link   
I think just by looking at Rahm Emanuel, you get a good sense that he is one evil person.

Just look at him.

You read about this guy's past and you will know that he has Israel's interests first, and Americas second.



posted on Nov, 17 2008 @ 10:26 AM
link   
reply to post by ProfEmeritus
 


While I believe that mandatory service will never be allowed by the mothers of America as we have seen in the pass of many failed attempts to it the thing that worries me are The American job Killing NAFTA and the anti American Patriot Act.



posted on Nov, 17 2008 @ 10:46 AM
link   
reply to post by marg6043
 





While I believe that mandatory service will never be allowed by the mothers of America

While I certainly would not like to see a draft for civilian or military reasons, the history of the military draft indicates a propensity for Democratic Presidents to favor it. FDR started it, Carter reinstated registration for the draft, and Obama, in several campaign speeches indicated that he would favor a more "equitable way of insuring that people from all economic groups serve in the military.
Looking at the history of the draft shows that, unfortunately, mothers, fathers, and others will have no say in whether it is instituted:
usmilitary.about.com...




Background of Selective Service

For more than 50 years, Selective Service and the registration requirement for America's young men have served as a backup system to provide manpower to the U.S. Armed Forces.

President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940 which created the country's first peacetime draft and formally established the Selective Service System as an independent Federal agency.

From 1948 until 1973, during both peacetime and periods of conflict, men were drafted to fill vacancies in the armed forces which could not be filled through voluntary means.

A lottery drawing - the first since 1942 - was held on December 1, 1969, at Selective Service National Headquarters in Washington, D.C. This event determined the order of call for induction during calendar year 1970, that is, for registrants born between January 1, 1944 and December 31, 1950. Reinstitution of the lottery was a change from the oldest first method, which had been the determining method for deciding order of call.

366 blue plastic capsules containing birth dates were placed in a large glass jar and drawn by hand to assign order-of-call numbers to all men within the 18-26 age range specified in Selective Service law.

With radio, film and TV coverage, the capsules were drawn from the jar, opened, and the dates inside posted in order. The first capsule - drawn by Congressman Alexander Pirine (R-NY) of the House Armed Services Committee - contained the date September 14, so all men born on September 14 in any year between 1944 and 1950 were assigned lottery number 1. The drawing continued until all days of the year had been matched to lottery numbers.

In 1973, the draft ended and the U.S. converted to an All-Volunteer military.

The registration requirement was suspended in April 1975. It was resumed again in 1980 by President Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Registration continues today as a hedge against underestimating the number of servicemen needed in a future crisis

How the Draft has Changed Since Vietnam

If a draft were held today, it would be dramatically different from the one held during the Vietnam War. A series of reforms during the latter part of the Vietnam conflict changed the way the draft operated to make it more fair and equitable. If a draft were held today, there would be fewer reasons to excuse a man from service.

Before Congress made improvements to the draft in 1971, a man could qualify for a student deferment if he could show he was a full-time student making satisfactory progress toward a degree.

Under the current draft law, a college student can have his induction postponed only until the end of the current semester. A senior can be postponed until the end of the academic year.

If a draft were held today, local boards would better represent the communities they serve.
The changes in the new draft law made in 1971 included the provision that membership on the boards was required to be as representative as possible of the racial and national origin of registrants in the area served by the board.

A draft held today would use a lottery to determine the order of call.

Before the lottery was implemented in the latter part of the Vietnam conflict, Local Boards called men classified 1-A, 18 1/2 through 25 years old, oldest first. This resulted in uncertainty for the potential draftees during the entire time they were within the draft-eligible age group. A draft held today would use a lottery system under which a man would spend only one year in first priority for the draft - either the calendar year he turned 20 or the year his deferment ended. Each year after that, he would be placed in a succeedingly lower priority group and his liability for the draft would lessen accordingly. In this way, he would be spared the uncertainty of waiting until his 26th birthday to be certain he would not be drafted.

Information Courtesy of Selective Service



posted on Nov, 17 2008 @ 11:13 AM
link   
This time around the government will have to provide a very strong reason as why they need the bodies and the blood of the American sons and daughters to be forced into military service and war.

This time around people will not be as easily fooled and manipulated as right now our nation is hanging on thread with a very unhappy population.



posted on Jan, 8 2009 @ 03:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by kosmicjack

9/11 Mole in the White House?


Safire adds this information:

According to a high White House official speaking to me on background, the airliner that had taken off at Dulles—AA Flight 77—"did a 360" (meaning it changed direction from the White House) and at 9:45 slammed into the Pentagon.

Further down, he gets to the crux of the issue:

A threatening message received by the Secret Service was relayed to the agents with the president that "Air Force One is next." According to the high official, American code words were used showing a knowledge of procedures that made the threat credible.

(I have a second, on-the-record source about that: Karl Rove, the president's senior adviser, tells me: "When the president said 'I don't want some tinhorn terrorists keeping me out of Washington,' the Secret Service informed him that the threat contained language that was evidence that the terrorists had knowledge of his procedures and whereabouts. In light of the specific and credible threat, it was decided to get airborn with a fighter escort.")

After quoting material also found in Apple’s article, Safire finally draws a conclusion:

The most worrisome aspect of these revelations has to do with the credibility of the "Air Force One is next" message. It is described clearly as a threat, not a friendly warning—but if so, why would the terrorists send the message? More to the point, how did they get the code-word information and transponder know-how that established their mala fides?

That knowledge of code words, presidential whereabouts and possession of secret procedures indicates that the terrorists may have a mole in the White House—that, or informants in the Secret Service, F.B.I., F.A.A. or C.I.A. If so, the first thing our war on terror needs is an Angleton-type counterspy.

Safire’s conclusions mirror those of fellow columnist Robert Novak, who began his column of the same day (New York Post, 9/13 p. 59) by saying that “Security experts and airline officials agree privately that the simultaneous hijacking of four airliners was an ‘inside job,’ probably indicating complicity beyond malfeasance.”


www.abovetopsecret.com...

After posting that tidbit, I did some more digging and was surprised by what I found. It also led me to this thread. I knew that many claim Rahm Emmanuel has strong ties to Israel, but did not know to what extent.

Can anyone shed more insight on the following claims?

sydwalker.info...

adap2k.blogspot.com...


Rep. Rahm Benjamin Emanuel, the Democrat congressman for the 5th District of Illinois in Chicago is the son of an Israeli terrorist. Rahm's father, Benjamin, was a member of the Irgun, the Zionist terrorist organization that coined a new word as they blew up hotels, train stations, and other buildings in Palestine in the 1930s and 40s.

Rahm was an Israeli citizen until he was 18 years old, when for obvious reasons he hid his Israeli passport in his underwear drawer. In 1991, however, he pulled his Israeli passport out and went and reportedly joined the Israeli Army to defend Zion from Saddam's Scuds.

Irgun, the army of his father, is short for Irgun Zvai Leumi, which supposedly means something like "National Military Organization" in Hebrew. As a matter of fact, the Irgun was simply a terrorist Zionist group that operated in Palestine from 1931 to 1948. They killed innocent Palestinians and British soldiers and blew up buildings.


Apparently it's widely held that Emmanuel may be "Mega" the Mossad agent in DC.

www.janes.com...


Shortly before George Tenet retired as director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in June, he alleged that an Israeli agent was operating in Washington. Tenet was challenged to identify the agent but for reasons that were never explained apparently did not do so. For years, the FBI has been convinced that there is at least one high-level Israeli mole in Washington.


It was convenient for 9/11 to happen in a hawkish GOP administration rather than under peacenik Clintion's watch. The crusade like anti-Islamic reaction to the attacks was probably easily guessed.

I'm really starting to question the timing of Israel's current actions - in-between a lame-duck hawk and an incoming President-elect with a pro-Israeli chief of staff. No one would have to step up and deal with it and no one has.

As far as Obama is concerned, my new stance is optimistic but suspicious.






[edit on 8/1/2009 by kosmicjack]




top topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join