It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
I'll let the fact that both of you seem to be too young to recall, first of all, this was BACK during Vietnam. It was a different time, different world. CoolHand doesn't know that military regs change frequently in both small and large ways. But hey - CoolHand did some research - way to go!
As a member of the military it is my responsibilty to periodically review the regulations. Ever hear of GMT? I am pretty sure that I am more up on the regs than you are.
Starchild, this issue was brought up back in 2000 when Shrub was running for president, but the good 'ol media let it slide down the memory hole - like they let Shrub get away with not answering questions about his drug use.
How about it was a non-issue, and would not be today if the Dems weren't getting desperate.
The military is being vindictive with him. Bush got away with it because his father was a congressman (at the time). Complete Bu#.
If anything the military is being fair with him. If they went by the book, then they would be setting up for an execution.
eck, can you show me the actual declaration of war against Vietnam?
[Edited on 31/3/04 by COOL HAND]
Originally posted by COOL HAND
As a member of the military it is my responsibilty to periodically review the regulations.
Ever hear of GMT? I am pretty sure that I am more up on the regs than you are.
I'm sure it's never occurred to you that I might have actually written some.. not just studied them.
ECK:
Starchild, this issue was brought up back in 2000 when Shrub was running for president, but the good 'ol media let it slide down the memory hole - like they let Shrub get away with not answering questions about his drug use.
How about it was a non-issue, and would not be today if the Dems weren't getting desperate.
Desperation, huh? This administration is who is feeling desperation. The lies they've told are swirling around so fast, they're having a helluva time keeping them straight at this point. why the hell do you think Karen Hughes had to come back to rescue Shrub's a$$? Use your own brain for once, CoolHand.
If anything the military is being fair with him. If they went by the book, then they would be setting up for an execution.
Thoroughly antiquated punishment. Get with the program.
eck, can you show me the actual declaration of war against Vietnam?
Of course not! Congress abdicated its constitutional duty to declare war, just like they did this time around. Keep on defending the indefensible, though.
[Edited on 31/3/04 by COOL HAND]
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
I love bein' the cat to your mouse. It's just too easy, CoolHand.
Really, casue you look like a fool right now to me. Read on:
Ever hear of GMT? I am pretty sure that I am more up on the regs than you are.
[I'm sure it's never occurred to you that I might have actually written some.. not just studied them.
Whatever. Just like you said the regs keep changing and you have been out so long that whatever you learned is no longer valid.
Desperation, huh? This administration is who is feeling desperation. The lies they've told are swirling around so fast, they're having a helluva time keeping them straight at this point. why the hell do you think Karen Hughes had to come back to rescue Shrub's a$$? Use your own brain for once, CoolHand.
Really, what has she done so far?
If anything the military is being fair with him. If they went by the book, then they would be setting up for an execution.
Thoroughly antiquated punishment. Get with the program.
How is it antiquated? Why shouldn't someone who flees in a time of war be expected to pay for his crime.
eck, can you show me the actual declaration of war against Vietnam?
Of course not! Congress abdicated its constitutional duty to declare war, just like they did this time around. Keep on defending the indefensible, though.
Then how can you keep saying that Bush was abesent at a time of war when NO WAR WAS EVER DECLARED? Did you just happen to remember that little nugget when you wrote your response to me?
In the future please think before you write, it would do us all a favor.
Originally posted by Pyros
If this schmuck is a conscientious objector, he should have never joined in the first place.
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by Pyros
If this schmuck is a conscientious objector, he should have never joined in the first place.
Most likely, he joined before this Iraq BS took place. That's what happened to a friend of mine when the last war happened. He just happened to be in the reserves when they went to war on Iraq.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Really, casue you look like a fool right now to me.
Name-calling. Impressive.
Whatever. Just like you said the regs keep changing and you have been out so long that whatever you learned is no longer valid.
I can read the regs till my eyes cross If there is a reason to.
Desperation, huh? This administration is who is feeling desperation. The lies they've told are swirling around so fast, they're having a helluva time keeping them straight at this point. why the hell do you think Karen Hughes had to come back to rescue Shrub's a$$? Use your own brain for once, CoolHand.
Really, what has she done so far?
Say what?!
How is it antiquated? Why shouldn't someone who flees in a time of war be expected to pay for his crime.
Why don't you tell us when the last time it was they executed someone for desertion.
Then how can you keep saying that Bush was abesent at a time of war when NO WAR WAS EVER DECLARED? Did you just happen to remember that little nugget when you wrote your response to me?
It's all semantics. I don't expect you to grasp that, tho.
In the future please think before you write, it would do us all a favor.
You should do us the same favor.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
He was signing up for the military. Just what did he think would happen?
I love how people want the benefits but are not willing to pay the price when it comes time.
What is there to understand, you made the claim that Bush did worse than this guy in a time of war, now you agree that there was no war declared.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Our job involves risks, but in exchange for taking those risks we get to leagally blow things up and shoot guns.
Originally posted by Satyr
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Our job involves risks, but in exchange for taking those risks we get to leagally blow things up and shoot guns.
That statement just showed your mentality. I'd say you must be one of those dimmer bulbs.