reply to post by Soulstone
I am in absolute agreement with you, especially when it comes to prescribing medication for children or teenagers as soon as they "act out". And I
have a good friend who is several years younger than I who is in recovery from her addiction to Ritalin, which she crushed and snorted rather than
"using as directed".
I am sure that some immoral doctors have pushed pills on people who don't need them for profit; I am sure that the drug companies encourage us to
believe that any sadness is equivalent to depression and should be treated with a pill.
I try to contribute to threads like this for several reasons. The first is, that I am genuinely happy that you were able to get off the meds. They
have unpleasant and potentially dangerous side effects, even if you don't take their psychoactive qualities into consideration, and I don't think
anyone who doesn't need them should be on them.
The second is to let people know that yes, some people do need the medication, and that it's important not to make those people feel like there is
something wrong with that. We should not let the drug companies pushing their pills on people who don't need them, interfere with the treatment of
people who do.
The third is that I actually think my point about numbness could be an important one for people to help tell if they are being medicated unnecessarily
or if they need the medication. It is a point I have not seen made in the main stream or alternative media, but to me it is a clear difference. If the
pills make you feel more "numbed out" and "disconnected" than you did before, it may be a sign that you are being treated with unnecessary
medicine. If on the other hand, the pills have increased your ability to feel and think clearly, there's a good chance they're helping.
I didn't think you were trying to say that no one needed them – you and others in this thread have been very responsible about saying that there
are some who do. I just wanted to chip in as one who does