Following up on the groundbreaking work of Masaru Emoto, Sereda exposed water to the sounds of the sun, and the water crystals changed to a beatific shape.
IMHO, undiluted, beatific BS.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Water is diamagnetic, everything in the universe is electromagnetic.
There are plenty of substances that are diamagnetic... Your point?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
What people fail to realize, is that humans are about 60-70% water.
Most people know that piece of trivia
What people fail to realize is the effects of the Moon, Sun, Stars, and Planets on the water of our own bodies,
including the ocean tides. Originally posted by buddhasystem
Could you quantify the effect of stars on ocean tides?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
A molecule cannot be "heat up". Concept of heat describes properties of macroscopic objects, not molecules.
Are you so thick headed that you don't understand when someone is trying to simplify an explanation???
Microwave heating works by heating the water in foods. The frequency used in microwave ovens optimally heats water molecules. The microwave energy is converted into heat energy of the water molecules, which in turn heat the other molecules in the food.
Why do Rotating Water Molecules Heat Food?
The answer has to do with the nature of heat energy and temperature. Heat energy is the random kinetic energy (energy of motion) of the individual atoms and molecules. When something is hotter, the atoms and molecules are randomly moving around more rapidly. As the temperature decreases, the atoms and molecules move more slowly.
As the water molecules rotate, they bump other molecules causing them to begin moving randomly. The process is like frictional heating. Microwave energy converts to heat energy by causing the molecules in food to increase the speed of their random motions.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
No it's not.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
What???
Originally posted by buddhasystem
No it is not.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
There are many other secrets about hydrogen and oxygen, and water, that I can not share here. But soon enough the secrets will be rediscovered and known.
Why won't you share if they will come out quite soon anyway?
![]()
.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Thanks for the chuckle, your post has comic value, after all.

Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
you make a sound with your electromagnetic mouth, those electromagnetic movements vibrate the electromagnetic air like waves
Sorry but that sounds like electromagnetic gibberish. Air molecules are neutral in terms of charge, and apart from some relatively subtle effects their inner structure can have on thermodynamics of such gas, sound is a phenomenon that can be explained and described without relying on electromagnetics.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Do you know the shape of a water molecule? Can it exist in more than one shape?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Sound is an electromagnetic vibration of a medium. It is waves of electromagnetic particles.
Waves of particles? Doesn't make sense. There is no mass transfer in sound, just oscillations of density.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
All things in the universe are made of atoms, and they are electromagnetic.
Once again, you are wrong -- most matter in the Universe exists in the form of plasma (there is also dark matter, but that's a separate subject). So, you are wrong with "atoms".
.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Wrong again. There is gravity, there is strong interaction and there is weak interaction, all of which play important parts in what we experience and observe..
duh Originally posted by buddhasystem
Wow, you completely ignored my simplicity of words, and missed the point. The fact remains, all matter is made of 3 basic particles.
It is not. Never mind there are also neutrinos etc, protons and neutrons are made of quarks and gluon's, hence you thesis is wrong (AGAIN).
Matter is commonly defined as being anything that has mass and that takes up space. However this definition is ambiguous, and leads to some problems, leading some physicists to define matter in terms of certain types of elementary particles.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
In summary, I would characterize your level on knowledge of subject matter as pathetic.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
You don't understand. It's ok.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Do you know the shape of a water molecule? Can it exist in more than one shape?
Almost all Snowflakes have different molecular structures.
"Oscillations of density", of what?
Oscillations are negative and positive electromagnetic interactions.
Oscillations of air particles = sound.
Oscillations of water particles = sound.
Oscillations of ANY particles = sound.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Once again, you are wrong -- most matter in the Universe exists in the form of plasma (there is also dark matter, but that's a separate subject). So, you are wrong with "atoms".
Once again, you are trying to hard. Your actions are noticeable. You are not reading my simple explanations correctly, and you are making this more complex than it needs to be.
The point is, ALL MATTER IS MADE OF ATOMS.
answers.yahoo.com...
I don't understand why you have trouble with this.....
All matter is made of sub-atomic electromagnetic particles. Dark matter, Plasma, everything..... is made of the same particles. That was my point , that you obviously purposely missed.
The strong and the weak interactions are ELECTRIC INTERACTIONS.
All the four fundamental forces are electric forces.
There is a widely held belief that no two snowflakes are alike. Strictly speaking, it is extremely unlikely for any two macroscopic objects in the universe to contain an identical molecular structure; but there are, nonetheless, no known scientific laws that prevent it.
In particle physics, the strong interaction, or strong force, or color force, holds quarks and gluons together to form protons and neutrons.
Before the 1970s, protons and neutrons were thought to be indivisible fundamental particles. It was known that protons carried a positive electrical charge, electric repulsion made same-charge particles repel each other, and multiple protons were bound together in the atomic nucleus. However, it was unknown what force held the like-charged protons together in the nucleus.
Another, stronger, attractive force was postulated to explain how protons were held together in the atomic nucleus, overcoming electromagnetic repulsion. For its high strength at short distances, it was dubbed the "strong" force. It was thought, at that time, this strong force was a fundamental force acting directly on the protons.
It was later discovered this phenomenon was only a residual side-effect of another, truly fundamental, force acting directly on particles inside protons called quarks and gluons. This newly-discovered force was initially called the "color force." This has no relation to visible color. [1]
Today, the term "strong force" is used for that strong nuclear force that acts directly on quarks and gluons. The original strong force that acts on protons is today called the nuclear force, or the "residual strong nuclear force."