It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by masterofpuppets
if a shuttle could move slow going into the atmosphere would it still burn up?
Originally posted by jra
Correct me if i'm wrong. I don't think it's a certain volocity, but a certain angle. If you come in to shallow of an angle, you'll skip (like skipping rocks on water). come in too steep and you'll smash to pieces.
Originally posted by silQ
isn't that the whole point of slowing down the shuttle as it enters the atmosphere? to keep it from burning up? duh.........
Originally posted by Valhall
Kano,
True. They could descend in multiple orbits and decrease the heating that way.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
it would be neat though to see a giant fireball orbiting the earth several times...
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Originally posted by Valhall
Kano,
True. They could descend in multiple orbits and decrease the heating that way.
once you enter into the thickness of earth's atmosphere there's no orbiting around more. also, as they come into earth the shuttle would speed up in orbit. it can be related to kepler's second law. the closer in an object is the faster it will orbit.
Originally posted by masterofpuppets
if a shuttle could move slow going into the atmosphere would it still burn up?
There is still the option of a slower Powered Descent though. But that would be an insanely massive waste of fuel when we can so easily use the atmosphere to brake the Shuttle. Not to mention that a powered descent is probably just as dangerous as the current method.