posted on Sep, 27 2008 @ 02:01 PM
^^Not a bad idea.
Just imagine if it was turned way around, and:
1. The lawyers didnt have to be paid for by any right-holders, but would get equal money with no favors attatched from the government...
2. The police (fed to state to local) had to be paid to come out by the complianer that's either the claimed victim of a crime or someone acting
helpful for the claimed victim... (I mean, it's already a victim has to pay the bill for the ambalance that took them...)
In order to ensure our rights we dont have to pay up for the government would have to not use tax payer money to pay the lawyers, but use a money
backed by the particular labor itself the lawyer should do in the best way possible. Then our rights would be truely free for us to truely have to
express their facts, which are supposed to fight 'for' us in a court of law, after a violation we experienced or a plaintif's accusations we must
face. The lawyer should be paid an equal amount. And the particular lawyer should be paid an extra amount, by the government's labor backed money, if
they win the case for a claimed victim or a defendent. Or maybe, they shouldnt be paid at all if they lose a case for which either one they represent.
Least then you'd know they'd care for money, if not for you, to put up a hella of an effort for you.
#1 could work, and work better than the way things are now. But #2 prolly wouldnt be allowed to pass into law.
[edit on 27-9-2008 by Mabus]