posted on Sep, 17 2008 @ 09:20 PM
too many ideas running through my feeble excuse for a brain, but just a few thoughts re the official story on why the towers fell.
1 For the "Official story" to be true the damage from the planes and the weakening of the steel from the fire in the WTC must have been
2 At least for the 2nd tower that was hit (the first to fall) the plane certainly did not hit the building squarely, therefore the damage was more to
one side than the other. The top of this tower should have toppled towards the weak side. Just like a tree falls toward the wedge cut.
In addition I have never seen the stump of a tree collapse.
Think it through and you will realize that the structure below the damaged areas was not heated due to fire, nor was it damaged due to impact, yet it
collapsed also. The structure below the damaged areas was operating at full strength, the top of the tower should have tipped towards the damage and
twisted as it fell.
3 The idea that the fire severely weakened the steel does not persuade me either. If that was the case we have some very serious problems. The brakes
in our cars, the BBQ you cook on, the internal components of jet engines these should be failing every day.
This building and all the others were helped down. I don't know by who, I
have a few suspects, but what is truly needed is a fair open and thorough investigation, conducted in public, with the ability to subpoena and charge
those found to be negligent or worse.