I noticed that the protesters at the Republican National Convention were more militant than the protesters at the Democrat National Convention. From my analysis, there are two general forms of opposition at each of these conventions. There are those who support the opposition and those who disagree with both and want something totally different. This is considering we are essentially a two party nation.

So, why then would the violent protesters only attack the RNC? Are the liberal democrats more violent than conservative republicans? Do third party protesters only have aggressive tendencies towards republicans?

I'm having a hard time trying to understand the perspective of the violent protesters.

I distinctly recall some at the DNC chanting O-Ba-Ma at times outside of the MSM booths, so they were not protesters but demonstrators.

And then of course you had the group of "Anarchists" at the RNC.