The Secret Covenant (A Satanic Point of View)

If we have a Black Jesus then we should have a Jewish Mohamed.

Queen Nefertiti....she doesnt look "Purple" to me, nor does she have "Broad nose, thick lips"

Mr Fard was white and Elisha Mohamed was half white.

Because Nefertiti was half Hittite, if I remember correctly.

But since melanin is genetically dominant, she would probably have still been quite dark.

I say "probably" because, for example: Master Fard Muhammad is a rare exception, in that he as a "mulatto" had lighter skin.

Not all so-called 'black' people have broad noses and thick lips(Merotic features).

And People are not actually black or white, otherwise mulatto children would be gray; although some people are so brown as to appear black or purple or dark-blue like Krishna.

Many 'black' people are Nilotic, having relatively thin noses and lips.

The Nubians and Khemetians seem to have a been a mixture of Merotic and Nilotic peoples; the Nubian Kush-ites leaning a little more toward Merotic features, and the Khemetians leaning a little more toward Nilotic features.




[edit on 25-11-2006 by Tamahu]

Mr Fard's Father was a Scots/Irish and his mother was was Half European and Half Polynesian. He had NO African ancestry. Elisha Muhamed was a Mulatto.

Erm, that sounds a bit "far out". My mother is a Zoroastran and as far as I know Ahura-Mazda is literally the Wise Lord (his "angels" or minor gods including the likes of Mitha and Mehr etc...). Also, in my somewat limited knowledge of Christianity, Jesus was not God.... simple as that.

Sad to think that the Persian Wise Men that visited Christ were Zoroastrans and that they payed respects to an individual who's influence in religion would be a forbear to the Arab invasion of Persia and the subsequent establishing of Islam instead of Zoroastranism as the official religion.

Bet those three wise men are kicking themselves in the afterlife and wishing they'd whisked the infant straight to the authorities!

Yeah, that's what some people say anyway.

It's possible I guess.





[edit on 26-11-2006 by Tamahu]

Greetings DenyAllKnowledge


We have to remember that the Kabbalah is the Esoteric-Science that explains all Religion.

So Ahura-Mazda is indeed the Logos(Christ).

And Ahriman is "Satan", but of course there is a much deeper significance to that than the exoteric idea of a devil with horns and a tail, etc.

H.P. Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine" and Eliphas Levi's works, and the works of Samael Aun Weor explain much of this.


So anyway, all the confusion between Religions comes from not understanding the veiled Kabbalah and Alchemy found in all of them.

The Magi worshipped the Christic Fire, the Fohat, etc. and knew that it was Incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth.

They knew that the Bodhisattva of Aberamentho had Reincarnated to finish Raising the Fiery Serpents upon the Staff, as to teach Gods and Men how to be free of suffering.

The Islamic Sufis and the Tantric Buddhists know all this as well.




Regards

About Aberamentho and the Three Magi:

reply to post by TgSoe

---

YOU FOOL us of course all of human life.

The are many different versions of this text all over the internet. It has been attributed to anyone of the following: the Illuminati, Aliens, Reptilians (don't tell certain ATS members! :lol, Satanists, the NWO, etc.

The first time I saw it it was attributed to a wealthy european banker but I can't find the link.

It is mostly likely a hoax but that doesn't mean it doesn't "feel true".

Here is another link with a bit of background:

www.freedom-force.org...



There are several other infamous texts which detail a strategy against humanity that have somewhat more interesting and provocative origins.

Soft metals? How about atmospheric pressure? There are reasonable known causes for the declination of life spans. Don't let secret societies take credit for atmospheric pressure, that is way beyond their control.

This literature is moving, catchy, and reflects on many well-ingrained ideologies like the current practices of those in power, and apocalyptic literature like found in the Bible. This makes it relevant and convincing.

The obvious question to ask here is, who created this all-powerful society. Surely it did not create itself.

There cannot be an infinite regress of current causes of existence. If there were an infinate regression of causes, an infinate number of events would have had to occur in order to get to the current state of events that we live in. (do you see the flaw in logic here?) We then must start with an uncaused cause (Or as they refer to it, the Prime Creator).

Time is a function of space. They mention traveling the stars, and repeating life spans. The claim that they are defeating the limits of time by repeating life makes them sound awfully finite, especially when considering the extra-dimensional dieties inferred with mathematics.

So, we have established that 1. they are not self created, and 2. that they are confined by the limits of time.

What are they left with?

A society, that is bound by the laws of physics and believes in reincarnation.

It's known that pharmacuticles are over-perscribed for the sake of profit. It's known that traces of Prozac can be found in drinking water. It's known that poisons are in the air as a result of natural events and pollution, as well as the development of viruses and breeding of bacteria, and if youre going to say this secret society caused these things we are once again returned to causality (what created the society members, what created that creator of that creator, and so fourth).

They mention the "PRIME CREATOR" The claim that "us" finding out about them will cause the Prime Creator to know what they're up to, violates the very nature of the Prime Creator. The prime creator can not learn because that would be change, the Prime Creator must have eternally had all the intellect required to be the uncaused cause. (All knowing)


Some conspiracy theories are plausible, for example, the origin of the AIDS virus. Most however, are not.

This article is like water, it swirls around seemingly directional until it all flows down the drain.

you guys are missing the point. arguing whether jesus was white or black or brown is only relevant on a mediocre level at best.

unless scriptures are found proving that jesus actually said and did things that were greater than buddha why would you even listen to the man?

oh he said, treat others as you want to be treated, and he got mad at the money changers?

ahhh... i could get that from watching dr. phil!

forget that guy, listen to buddha!!!!!!

wow. "they" are the first to attack a subject.

[edit on 20-10-2009 by thaknobodi]