posted on Aug, 1 2008 @ 08:33 AM
Well having read all of Sitchin's Earth Chronicles books (very long read). I don't put much faith in what he says, simply because it's all based on
conjecture and he offers no proof or evidence to backup his claims.
The same applies to Alex Collier. Why is it that none of these contactees ever have any hard evidence or proof to backup what they're saying. In Alex
Collier's case, he comes across as someone who has a very important message for humanity, that could very well determine our own survival, if we
don't heed his warnings. Then he expects us to take everything he says at face value without offering any proof.
This guy has supposedly met with Aliens from the galactic federation, so surely it can't be that difficult to borrow or aquire some kind of Alien
technology, that would add substance to his claims. A fancy holographic display would suffice.
Apparently even the Aliens themselves are
concerned. So what's the big deal. You want us to believe, then show us proof.
No proof, no credibility.
As for your original question:
The Annunaki supposedly created man originally as a slave race, and according to Alex Collier, various ET races then modified our DNA afterwards, over
a certain time period.