McCain: It'll be fixed in 4 years, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:17 AM by apolluwn
It looks like you posted this on Monday so, technically, he is announcing this today.

Why is he announcing it Monday and not Sunday? Well.. This is because he is having a Town Hall meeting and this article is based on his talking points briefing (or something to that extent) for the event. You already knew that, though.

I always like how everything is going to be fixed in four years, though. Then the next election season arrives and it's all about blaming the other party for blocking everything that didn't get done, but don't worry... If we can get our party in control of the House and Senate... Then if we can retain majority control/gain control of the House, Senate and I am re-elected then everything I promised will be done before my tenure is up plus all this new stuff that we have made you think are the most important issues.

I love how all this political mumbo-jumbo is worded, though.

It is very strong (I will ... even if ... they won't), infinitely vague (generic solution to generic problem), lacks any real solutions (I will do this generic thing without any indication of how), already blames the other party (if they won't), and is utterly meaningless (I will ... they won't ... I'll act ... [applause]).


I mean just reading this makes me think this could not be meant for public consumption. We are going to "tell oil producing countries ... our dependence will come to an end" and that will "drive oil prices down". What? Not if they read this, right? Then they'll just call your bluff...

His policies will "increase the value of the dollar". Oh, OK. Am I taking your word for it? what policies? Oh... I see it says right there. "Globalization"... will stimulate our economy. Great... Care to explain that plan Mr. McCain? No comment? Figures.


It would be rather short-sighted of me, however, to say this is solely a McCain-Republican issue.

At the risk of infuriating the OP, I must say that this type of drivel goes both ways, but this is certainly not the thread to discuss that. Nevertheless, I do believe that this point is valid.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^