posted on Mar, 8 2004 @ 11:12 AM
Can anyone explain the gate photos, the intensity of the flash?
Surely people have read about the parallel flight paths of this inside operation. (Like duh, there are trillions of extra future dollars for special
corporate hardware and banking interests invested in the 911 demolitions?) It is possible for more than one corridor, eg. a global hawk AND a
plausible commercial aircraft not necessarily in the same order, controlled by AWACS. You simply fly in the aircraft for a cover story and then let
the global hawk or the cruise missile "do its duty," within seconds.
Remember remote controlling aircraft are nothing new, if you maintain history. Joe Kennedy Jr died in World War II while remote controlling another
aircraft for his then important mission.
The biggest stumbling block may well be the confiscated of the gas station security camera photos. It is right near the event. Those videos reveal
what really happened. Can it only be a coverup of some kind, that the truth is hidden and taxpayers will pay the bill for this inside job?
I am sad that too many of us have been such suckers for emotions. When the sheer physical fact of 911 is similar to any Vegas demolition, the
exception is the fact that our shadow government left the people inside without warning. All of us direct our emotions to "Osama," when in fact no
one from this shadow government and the regular elected government has ever explained the absence of normal intercepts from NORAD. Hey go back to your
Dilbert cubicles, and ask your superiors for a better set of arguments. This entire operation was so sloppy only misdirection, total control of the
media, and literal belief structures in propaganda, compensate in any measure.
It is not surprising that a public that ignores its own power, can just key tow to all the emotional paired associations, and thrust itself into
whatever Frankenstein the shadow government requires. I applaud all the peasants with their torches and the theater of it, but this entire episode as
it continues has no plausibility and no adequate explanation.
There is simply too much evidence, even in the general media that is "in your face." Nothing explains how a white flash proceeded in the gate photo,
and how jet fuel can ever burn at 4000 degrees or some such level. The science is not there, with the USG "explanations."
I give maybe a D minus grade for "plausible deniability," on this entire thing. The only reason for not flunking is they don't give out F grades
anymore, due to dumbing down of any semblence of academic rigor for too many people of the public.
On the other hand as too often in history, authority tells you the earth is flat because it can. Fact vs. belief is the story of history. The earth is
really flat you know, "because we say so." Much more "I will not look in your microscope Mr. Leeuwenhoek." Even Louis Pastuer had to struggle with
this microbe thing, when when common knowledge from Galen in Rome advised upon cleanliness. The dark ages are the most difficult from which to
Why does it take years for even the most simple technical advances to open eyes, and renew counsel? 911 is no exception to the standard paradigm we
know. It is a struggle just to confront authority on anything at all, no matter how stupid it is.
When you've got a wife, kids to feed, and a mortgage to burn in a few years, you know, who needs to think anyway?
[Edited on 8-3-2004 by SkipShipman]