It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to the Air Force, factors in the selection for production of the F-22 were a better designed for maintainability, greater potential for future development, and slightly lower cost. Secretary of the Air Force Donald B. Rice stated that the choice was based on confidence in the ability of the Lockheed team and Pratt & Whitney to produce the aircraft and its engine at projected costs. Emphasizing the importance of the Lockheed team's management and production plans, he denied that either prototype was significantly more maneuverable or stealthy. A popular view is that the decision reflected a preference for maneuverability over stealth
Originally posted by Valhall
It is yet another example that history repeats itself even when it didn't go right the first time - and this is especially true when the Pentagon is involved; and even more so when the Air Force is involved.
Both the Lockheed F-22 & Northrop/McDonnell Douglas' F-23 met most of the U.S. Air Force requirements, but the way I understand it, it was industrial performance that mattered.
The 22 is also a lot more manueverable than the 23. If you looked at the tail end of the 23, you could see that it could only use thrust vectoring to make positve-G turns. The 22 can make both positive and negative-G turns with thrust vectoring.
It is an apprciable difference in the A2A department.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
because as you said, it will never go away. My whole point is that they were basically both equal, one having slightly better maneuverability, one having greater range, speed, and stealth. And as it is known, the ATF was designed to be great at everything, but it's MAIN tactic is BVR combat, which IMHO, the widow was slightly better equiped to deal with
Okay, if you are arguing BVR stuff I have an issue. They were both equipped with the same radar (same range, same tracking, etc). So now they are equal at the BVR stuff, and it comes down to the other factors, dogfighting, A2G, etc.
As far as BVR they were exactly evenly matched (with the exception of RCS).
Originally posted by intelgurl
Of course I was like 14 when that went down, but this seems to be the opinion of those in the industry.
Personally I think the F-23 is way more sexy than the more conventional looking F-22...
Okay, if you are arguing BVR stuff I have an issue. They were both equipped with the same radar (same range, same tracking, etc). So now they are equal at the BVR stuff, and it comes down to the other factors, dogfighting, A2G, etc.
oh i beg to differ.. the f22 is a much, much more beautiful plane than the bulky yf23
Originally posted by American Mad Man
OK, I was reading about these two aircraft wondering why the 22 was the choice. After a few reads on the 23, I actually now doubt our choice as the new front line fighter. The reason - air war today is not "dogfighting" anymore. BVR combat dominates current tactics.
the reasons stated were:
According to the Air Force, factors in the selection for production of the F-22 were a better designed for maintainability, greater potential for future development, and slightly lower cost. Secretary of the Air Force Donald B. Rice stated that the choice was based on confidence in the ability of the Lockheed team and Pratt & Whitney to produce the aircraft and its engine at projected costs. Emphasizing the importance of the Lockheed team's management and production plans, he denied that either prototype was significantly more maneuverable or stealthy. A popular view is that the decision reflected a preference for maneuverability over stealth
link
The F-22 is said to have "first look, first shot, first kill." If this were the tactic however, wouldn't the YF-23 been the better choice? At Mach 1.25 it was .08 Mach faster then the YF-22. It also was a bit more stealthy then the 22. So, if the USAF wants a plane that is going to go out, find it's targets, destroy them, then return to base, wouldn't the faster more stealthy aircraft have fit the bill?
My opinion is that the cheaper plane was the easy sell to congress, and since both aircraft are of magnificant quallity, it became a game of dollars. This kind of ticks me off if it is true, because that means we could have a slightly better plane for our pilots.
The idea that lockheed could produce the planes within the cost limit was highlited, but I have doubts as to how much better they would have been then Northrop.
Anyways here are some pics, and links:
the YF-23 Black Widow II
Widow II Link
Another
1 more
and now some raptor stuff
Raptor Link
another
and one from the USAF