It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Gingrich quips Bush should have allowed some 'reminder' attacks

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 29 2008 @ 03:49 PM
link   

Gingrich quips Bush should have allowed some 'reminder' attacks


rawstory.com


This is ... one of the great tragedies of the Bush administration," Gingrich continued. "The more successful they've been at intercepting and stopping bad guys, the less proof there is that we're in danger. And therefore, the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.' And it's almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us.
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on May, 29 2008 @ 03:49 PM
link   
I cant really say how credible this is it was sent to me, But if true its really not surprising all things considered, Unfortunately they did allow an attack to get through "just to remind us" It's called 9/11,
How can anyone actually believe an administration so stupid and inept that they can allow the largest terror attack in history to take place on American soil, Yet is so flawless that they have a 100% success rate at stopping further attacks, And still believe the first one was just a fluke?

bs...

rawstory.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 29 2008 @ 03:57 PM
link   
He said it, but from watching the video of the speech, its clear that he was being facetious and was using it to illustrate a point, that being that he believes the administration has done a very good job of preventing attacks on US soil and that in doing so, it has made it difficult to sell the danger he believes we're actually in.

As always, context is everything



posted on May, 29 2008 @ 04:07 PM
link   
Regardless of the authenticity of this story, people need to understand that this is the way those in power, or more importantly the think tanks that guide the decisions of those in power, think. It's all psychological.

These people are twisted to the very core.

Peace



posted on May, 29 2008 @ 04:11 PM
link   
reply to post by C0le
 


Think about it...if Clinton couldn't do it, what makes you think Bush was better at preventing terrorist attacks? What measures did Bush take to prevent any attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11? How about terrorist attacks overseas? Any of them successful like the 98 Embassy attacks or Khobar Towers in 96?



new topics

top topics
 
2

log in

join