There is substantive proof of a long history of weather modification, and climatic control, as well as chemtrail spraying in order to effect weather
and climatic control..
In 1986 Crispen Tickell (a high level atmospheric scientist / administrator) wrote the following in his paper "Climatic Change and World Affairs."
which is online at :
"The first would be designed to cover all major experiments by governments (or those for whom they were responsible) which were intended to test the
behaviour of the climate or which might inadvertently do so. There would be obvious problems over the definition of what should count as a major
experiment. This difficulty arose in the negotiation of the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any other Hostile Use of Environmental
Modification Techniques of 1977: how should we interpret "... environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects
It is important to note if you actually look up the Convention on the Prohibition of Military and any other hostile Use of Environmental Modification
Technique (a UN Paper) - it will state right in the framework agreement that weather modification is permitted (as long as it is for peaceful
Crispin if you actuall take the time to read his 'call for action' you will quckly see a number of high level weather modification experiments that
have been conducted in the past - he specifically mentions the following..
"Examples of activities which should come within this category are experiments in rainmaking and control of hail storms over a defined area; attempts
to disperse hurricanes and typhoons; systematic towing of icebergs away from polar waters to supply fresh water to arid regions; and putting certain
objects into space (such as the needles placed in orbit by the United States several years ago against protests from many scientists). Some such
experiments might be of scientific value and economic benefit, and might deserve full international encouragement and support. The purpose of an
agreement would not be to frustrate them, but simply to ensure that their implications were properly considered and understood in time. "
Think about what you just read,
1. Examples of activities (weather modification) were listed as follows.
- Towing Iceburgs
- Water diversion
- Cloud Seeding to trigger rain or control of hail storms
- NEEDLES PLACED IN ORBIT.
Hold on here, did you just read that correctly, he is talking about orbital satellites that can effect weather modification, and that many scientists
were highly opposed to this. What is this 'needles placed in orbit' bit - by the US (probably the military)
You see the information is all there, just go to the top of our scientific circles and read what they wrote.
US Militarys Plan for Total Weather Dominance.
Barnes, a consultant on the Air Force study, calmly outlined the history of the U.S. military’s weather modification programs and what would be
needed for future fully-integrated weather modification capabilities. The good doctor referenced the document "Spacecast 2020," later updated in
"Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025," which noted that "Atmospheric scientists have pursued terrestrial weather modification
in earnest since the 1940’s. . . . Space presents us with a new arena, technology provides new opportunities. . . "
While Spacecast 2020 had analyzed "the difficulty, cost and risk of developing a weather control system for military applications" as "extremely
high," Barnes offered a different perspective. He saw "opportunities to capitalize on investment militarily [as] Medium/High" while the "Political
implications/health hazards [were] Medium/Low."