Sex, Violence and the FCC, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 20-5-2008 @ 06:06 AM by moonking
Sex, Violence and the FCC
This has been bothering me every time I watch TV
Being a father of three (although my children are in their twenty’s) but thinking about what we want to relay to are children and what we are allowing the entertainment industry to shove down the throats of are Children, Where in the hell does the FCC have it’s head stuck?
Why don’t we have porn on TV in the United states of America, because we’re afraid we’ll give the youth of this country idea’s on how much fun it is having an organism with someone, YET, if the FCC admits that (and anyone else), then where do they stand with the demonic pleasure achieved when a program betrays someone being murdered and making a point of showing the sheer demonic joy of the murderer while showing the taking of a life
One show that comes to mind that has been on recently (someone help me on the name) repeatedly shows this guy walking into different crime scenes and reliving his mother getting butchered with a chain saw as blood is splattering all over him
And CSI, need I say more
The wholesale demonic killing is just absolutely running ramped all over the airwaves and I do mean airwaves ,we’re talking CBS, ABC, NBC and their fighting over ratings by trying to out do each other by being gorier than the competition
But god forbid if someone should get pleasure from sex
I’m talking graphical here
Graphic killings with loads of blood and screaming, begging “please don’t kill me” only to be smiled at while being snuffed out
And that’s ok, but god forbid if they showed the pleasure of sex graphically
Is it my Imagination or are we so hung up on sex so much that we’re not realizing that we’re teaching are children that being cruel in the utmost way while taking another humane life is a better option than sex?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to get porn on TV
Just trying to get violence to be treated with a little respect at least more than the FCC is willing to give it







[edit on 20-5-2008 by moonking]


reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 12:47 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by moonking



I have to agree with both of you in a sense.. that is, you and Grady.

There is to much sex and violence on TV. Period. And it is a deciding factor as to why I refuse to watch TV.

However..

I agree with you because if your going to show someone get butchered and so forth .. why not also show graphic sex/nudity?

While I don't agree with either, I don't see why one is allowed, while the other is not.

I mean, hell, if anything we should allow sex and nudity on TV, and not violence! .. I would rather teens watching a sexy naked model then a women being mathodically chopped up with graphic detail.

Seriously, I am surprised the youth do not suffer PTSD from watching prime time television .. I know soldiers who have not even seen stuff that bad while away at war!

Anyways, my stance: Boobies over decapitation, though both are "bad".
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags